These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27179256)
1. A Phoneme Perception Test Method for High-Frequency Hearing Aid Fitting. Schmitt N; Winkler A; Boretzki M; Holube I J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 May; 27(5):367-379. PubMed ID: 27179256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and nonlinear frequency compression for children with cookie-bite audiometric configurations. John A; Wolfe J; Scollie S; Schafer E; Hudson M; Woods W; Wheeler J; Hudgens K; Neumann S J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(10):1022-33. PubMed ID: 25514454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss. Wolfe J; John A; Schafer E; Nyffeler M; Boretzki M; Caraway T J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):618-28. PubMed ID: 21376003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli. Carter L; Dillon H; Seymour J; Seeto M; Van Dun B J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefit from non-linear frequency compression hearing aids in a clinical setting: the effects of duration of experience and severity of high-frequency hearing loss. Hopkins K; Khanom M; Dickinson AM; Munro KJ Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 24617592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on Mandarin speech and sound-quality perception in hearing-aid users. Chen X; You Y; Yang J; Qian J; Lu Q; Kuehnel V; Rehmann J; Liu B; Xu L Int J Audiol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):524-533. PubMed ID: 32441563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients. Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss. Seeto A; Searchfield GD J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech identification in children with hearing loss. Hillock-Dunn A; Buss E; Duncan N; Roush PA; Leibold LJ Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 24496288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits of Nonlinear Frequency Compression in Adult Hearing Aid Users. Kokx-Ryan M; Cohen J; Cord MT; Walden TC; Makashay MJ; Sheffield BM; Brungart DS J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):838-55. PubMed ID: 26554489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech Perception and Sound-Quality Rating with an Adaptive Nonlinear Frequency Compression Algorithm in Mandarin-Speaking Hearing Aid Users. Xu L; Voss SC; Yang J; Wang X; Lu Q; Rehmann J; Kuehnel V; Qian J J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Sep; 31(8):590-598. PubMed ID: 32340058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression and Digital Noise Reduction on Word Recognition and Satisfaction Ratings in Noise in Adult Hearing Aid Users. Plyler PN; Tardy B; Hedrick M J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):103-114. PubMed ID: 30461384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preliminary evaluation of a novel non-linear frequency compression scheme for use in children. Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer EC; Rehmann J; Jha S; Allegro Baumann S; John A; Jones C Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):976-988. PubMed ID: 28851244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extended bandwidth nonlinear frequency compression in Mandarin-speaking hearing-aid users. Tseng WH; Hsieh DL; Shih WT; Liu TC J Formos Med Assoc; 2018 Feb; 117(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 28392194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction. Saunders GH; Forsline A Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing. Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss. Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids. Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures. Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners. Grant KW; Walden TC J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]