These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27179261)

  • 1. Validation of the Home Hearing Test™.
    Margolis RH; Killion MC; Bratt GW; Saly GL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 May; 27(5):416-420. PubMed ID: 27179261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Home Hearing Test: Within-Subjects Threshold Variability.
    Margolis RH; Bratt G; Feeney MP; Killion MC; Saly GL
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):906-909. PubMed ID: 29356703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of the Home Hearing Test: Implications for Public Health.
    Mosley CL; Langley LM; Davis A; McMahon CM; Tremblay KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 30461396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry.
    Ho AT; Hildreth AJ; Lindsey L
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):876-83. PubMed ID: 20179426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AMTAS(®): automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: II. air conduction audiograms in children and adults.
    Margolis RH; Frisina R; Walton JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):434-9. PubMed ID: 21417674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some observations on the nature of the audiometric 4000 hz notch: data from 3430 veterans.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jan; 22(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21419067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
    Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AMTAS: automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: validation studies.
    Margolis RH; Glasberg BR; Creeke S; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Mar; 49(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 20109081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic Hearing Assessment in Schools: Validity and Time Efficiency of Automated Audiometry.
    Mahomed-Asmail F; Swanepoel de W; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 26809325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Large-Scale Examination of Veterans with Normal Pure-Tone Hearing Thresholds within the Department of Veterans Affairs.
    Billings CJ; Dillard LK; Hoskins ZB; Penman TM; Reavis KM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):928-935. PubMed ID: 30479265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of a Self-Administered Audiometry Application: An Equivalence Study.
    Whitton JP; Hancock KE; Shannon JM; Polley DB
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Oct; 126(10):2382-8. PubMed ID: 27140227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A treatise on the thresholds of interoctave frequencies: 1500, 3000, and 6000 Hz.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 24828218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distribution characteristics of normal pure-tone thresholds.
    Margolis RH; Wilson RH; Popelka GR; Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Saly GL
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(11):796-805. PubMed ID: 25938502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distribution of hearing loss characteristics in a clinical population.
    Margolis RH; Saly GL
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 18600134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Argument for Self-Report as a Reference Standard in Audiology.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):206-222. PubMed ID: 29488871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is it necessary to occlude the ear in bone-conduction testing at 4 kHz, in order to prevent air-borne radiation affecting the results?
    Tate Maltby M; Gaszczyk D
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(12):918-23. PubMed ID: 26446950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
    Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.