These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27179261)

  • 21. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
    Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automated hearing tests: applying the otogram to patients who are difficult to test.
    Yu J; Ostevik A; Hodgetts B; Ho A
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Oct; 40(5):376-83. PubMed ID: 22420392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perspectives on the Pure-Tone Audiogram.
    Musiek FE; Shinn J; Chermak GD; Bamiou DE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(7):655-671. PubMed ID: 28722648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Air conduction, bone conduction, and soft tissue conduction audiograms in normal hearing and simulated hearing losses.
    Adelman C; Cohen A; Regev-Cohen A; Chordekar S; Fraenkel R; Sohmer H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 25597465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reliability and accuracy of a method of adjustment for self-measurement of auditory thresholds.
    Van Tasell DJ; Folkeard P
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 23202154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W; Mngemane S; Molemong S; Mkwanazi H; Tutshini S
    Telemed J E Health; 2010 Jun; 16(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 20575723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development and evaluation of an audiology app for iPhone/iPad mobile devices.
    Larrosa F; Rama-Lopez J; Benitez J; Morales JM; Martinez A; Alañon MA; Arancibia-Tagle D; Batuecas-Caletrio A; Martinez-Lopez M; Perez-Fernandez N; Gimeno C; Ispizua A; Urrutikoetxea A; Rey-Martinez J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015; 135(11):1119-27. PubMed ID: 26144548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mild-Gain Hearing Aids as a Treatment for Adults with Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties.
    Roup CM; Post E; Lewis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):477-494. PubMed ID: 29863462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development and evaluation of a tablet-based diagnostic audiometer.
    Thoidis I; Vrysis L; Markou K; Papanikolaou G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 58(8):476-483. PubMed ID: 30987489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory steady-state responses.
    Korczak P; Smart J; Delgado R; Strobel TM; Bradford C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):146-70. PubMed ID: 22436114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Smartphone Based Audiometric Test for Confirming the Level of Hearing; Is It Useable in Underserved Areas?
    Renda L; Selçuk ÖT; Eyigör H; Osma Ü; Yılmaz MD
    J Int Adv Otol; 2016 Apr; 12(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 27340985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validity of automated threshold audiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mahomed F; Swanepoel de W; Eikelboom RH; Soer M
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):745-52. PubMed ID: 24165302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development and Validation of a Portable Hearing Self-Testing System Based on a Notebook Personal Computer.
    Liu Y; Yang D; Xiong F; Yu L; Ji F; Wang QJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):716-723. PubMed ID: 26333879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical validation of automated audiometry with continuous noise-monitoring in a clinically heterogeneous population outside a sound-treated environment.
    Brennan-Jones CG; Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Friedland PL; Atlas MD
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Sep; 55(9):507-13. PubMed ID: 27206551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability.
    Bornman M; Swanepoel W; De Jager LB; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 30461416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Correlations between audiogram and objective hearing tests in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Bishara L; Ben-David J; Podoshin L; Fradis M; Teszler CB; Pratt H; Shpack T; Feiglin H; Hafner H; Herlinger N
    Int Tinnitus J; 1999; 5(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10753428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automated Smartphone Threshold Audiometry: Validity and Time Efficiency.
    van Tonder J; Swanepoel W; Mahomed-Asmail F; Myburgh H; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):200-208. PubMed ID: 28277211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory Processing Testing: In the Booth versus Outside the Booth.
    Lucker JR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):679-684. PubMed ID: 28906239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
    Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.