These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27180511)

  • 1. [The effect of suggestibility on eyewitness identifications: A comparison between showups and lineups].
    Miura H; Itoh Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2016 Apr; 87(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 27180511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.
    Colloff MF; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of fillers on lineup performance.
    Wetmore SA; McAdoo RM; Gronlund SD; Neuschatz JS
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):48. PubMed ID: 29214209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: an archival analysis.
    Behrman BW; Davey SL
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 11688369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing encoding specificity and the diagnostic feature-detection theory of eyewitness identification, with implications for showups, lineups, and partially disguised perpetrators.
    Carlson CA; Hemby JA; Wooten AR; Jones AR; Lockamyeir RF; Carlson MA; Dias JL; Whittington JE
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Mar; 6(1):14. PubMed ID: 33660118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eyewitness confidence in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a criterion shift account for sequential mistaken identification overconfidence.
    Dobolyi DG; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 24188335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of verbal descriptions on performance in lineups and showups.
    Wilson BM; Seale-Carlisle TM; Mickes L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Jan; 147(1):113-124. PubMed ID: 28872330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the possible advantages of combining small lineups with instructions that discourage guessing-based selection.
    Therre A; Bell R; Menne NM; Mayer C; Lichtenhagen U; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14126. PubMed ID: 38898071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Bayesian analysis on the (dis)utility of iterative-showup procedures: The moderating impact of prior probabilities.
    Smith AM; Lindsay RC; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):503-16. PubMed ID: 27182619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selecting lineup foils in eyewitness identification experiments: experimental control and real-world simulation.
    Clark SE; Tunnicliff JL
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Jun; 25(3):199-216. PubMed ID: 11480800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage.
    Carlson CA; Gronlund SD; Clark SE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):118-128. PubMed ID: 18590368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Children's identification of faces from lineups: the effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy.
    Beresford J; Blades M
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(5):1102-13. PubMed ID: 16953771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.
    Wixted JT; Wells GL
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eyewitness Identification: Live, Photo, and Video Lineups.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Price HL; Valentine T
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 2018 Aug; 24(3):307-325. PubMed ID: 30100702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absolute-judgment models better predict eyewitness decision-making than do relative-judgment models.
    Smith AM; Ying RC; Goldstein AR; Fitzgerald RJ
    Cognition; 2024 Jul; 251():105877. PubMed ID: 39002429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.