These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27180810)

  • 1. The functional role of time compression.
    Zimmermann E; Derichs C; Fink GR
    Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():25843. PubMed ID: 27180810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tactile cues are more intrinsically linked to motor timing than visual cues in visual-tactile sensorimotor synchronization.
    Huntley MK; Nguyen A; Albrecht MA; Marinovic W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):1022-1037. PubMed ID: 38263510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multisensory temporal processing in own-body contexts: plausibility of hand ownership does not improve visuo-tactile asynchrony detection.
    Keys RT; Rich AN; Zopf R
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1431-1443. PubMed ID: 29546651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motor commands induce time compression for tactile stimuli.
    Tomassini A; Gori M; Baud-Bovy G; Sandini G; Morrone MC
    J Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 34(27):9164-72. PubMed ID: 24990936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration.
    Smit S; Rich AN; Zopf R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0224174. PubMed ID: 31841510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intersensory selective attention and temporal orienting operate in parallel and are instantiated in spatially distinct sensory and motor cortices.
    Pomper U; Keil J; Foxe JJ; Senkowski D
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Aug; 36(8):3246-59. PubMed ID: 26032901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals.
    Mayer KM; Di Luca M; Ernst MO
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():2-9. PubMed ID: 23953664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal binding effect in the action observation domain: Evidence from an action-based somatosensory paradigm.
    Vastano R; Deschrijver E; Pozzo T; Brass M
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Apr; 60():1-8. PubMed ID: 29494798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The implicit use of spatial information develops later for crossmodal than for intramodal temporal processing.
    Röder B; Pagel B; Heed T
    Cognition; 2013 Feb; 126(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 23099123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is attentional prioritization on a location where pain is expected modality-specific or multisensory?
    Vanden Bulcke C; Crombez G; Durnez W; Van Damme S
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Nov; 36():246-55. PubMed ID: 26184378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of visual stimuli on temporal order judgments of unimanual finger stimuli.
    Shibuya S; Takahashi T; Kitazawa S
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 179(4):709-21. PubMed ID: 17216148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual motion information modulates tactile roughness perception.
    Suzuishi Y; Hidaka S; Kuroki S
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13929. PubMed ID: 32811859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatiotemporal integration of tactile patterns along and across fingers.
    Trojan J; Heil M; Maihöfner C; Hölzl R; Kleinböhl D; Flor H; Benrath J
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():12-24. PubMed ID: 24239621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Extent of Task Specificity for Visual and Tactile Sequences in the Auditory Cortex of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing.
    Zimmermann M; Mostowski P; Rutkowski P; Tomaszewski P; Krzysztofiak P; Jednoróg K; Marchewka A; Szwed M
    J Neurosci; 2021 Nov; 41(47):9720-9731. PubMed ID: 34663627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The left fusiform gyrus hosts trisensory representations of manipulable objects.
    Kassuba T; Klinge C; Hölig C; Menz MM; Ptito M; Röder B; Siebner HR
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1566-77. PubMed ID: 21334444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multisensory peripersonal space: Visual looming stimuli induce stronger response facilitation to tactile than auditory and visual stimulations.
    Geers L; Kozieja P; Coello Y
    Cortex; 2024 Apr; 173():222-233. PubMed ID: 38430652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interactions between apparent motion rivalry in vision and touch.
    Conrad V; Vitello MP; Noppeney U
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):940-8. PubMed ID: 22810167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Everything is worth when it is close to my body: How spatial proximity and stimulus valence affect visuo-tactile integration.
    Spaccasassi C; Romano D; Maravita A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():42-51. PubMed ID: 30412839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The attentional-relevance and temporal dynamics of visual-tactile crossmodal interactions differentially influence early stages of somatosensory processing.
    Popovich C; Staines WR
    Brain Behav; 2014 Mar; 4(2):247-60. PubMed ID: 24683517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feeling better: separate pathways for targeted enhancement of spatial and temporal touch.
    Yau JM; Celnik P; Hsiao SS; Desmond JE
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Feb; 25(2):555-65. PubMed ID: 24390826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.