These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27180922)

  • 21. Biomechanical properties of repairs for dislocated AC joints using suture button systems with integrated tendon augmentation.
    Beitzel K; Obopilwe E; Chowaniec DM; Nowak MD; Hanypsiak BT; Guerra JJ; Arciero RA; Mazzocca AD
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2012 Oct; 20(10):1931-8. PubMed ID: 22210515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Editorial Commentary: Are Larger Screws the Answer When Anatomic Reconstruction of an Acromioclavicular Separation Fails?
    Denard PJ
    Arthroscopy; 2016 Aug; 32(8):1558. PubMed ID: 27495861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anatomic reconstruction of the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments with semitendinosus tendon graft for the treatment of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation provides good clinical and radiological results.
    Saccomanno MF; Marchi G; Mocini F; Vismara V; Campana V; Salvi AG; Scaini A; Milano G
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jul; 29(7):2356-2363. PubMed ID: 33108527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.
    Mazzocca AD; Santangelo SA; Johnson ST; Rios CG; Dumonski ML; Arciero RA
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Feb; 34(2):236-46. PubMed ID: 16282577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical results of single-tunnel coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus tendon.
    Yoo JC; Ahn JH; Yoon JR; Yang JH
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 May; 38(5):950-7. PubMed ID: 20228243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anatomical versus non-anatomical configuration of double coraco-clavicular tunnel technique in acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.
    Schöbel T; Theopold J; Fischer JP; Löffler S; Schleifenbaum S; Hepp P
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Apr; 142(4):641-648. PubMed ID: 33884453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Functional and Radiographic Outcomes After Allograft Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction.
    Baran S; Belisle JG; Granger EK; Tashjian RZ
    J Orthop Trauma; 2018 Apr; 32(4):204-210. PubMed ID: 29558374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical comparison of coracoclavicular reconstructive techniques.
    Thomas K; Litsky A; Jones G; Bishop JY
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Apr; 39(4):804-10. PubMed ID: 21257841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Anatomic Tunnel Placement Is Not Feasible by Transclavicular-Transcoracoid Drilling Technique for Coracoclavicular Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study.
    Koh KH; Shon MS; Choi NH; Lim TK
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Jul; 34(7):2012-2017. PubMed ID: 29653796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clavicular bone tunnel malposition leads to early failures in coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions.
    Cook JB; Shaha JS; Rowles DJ; Bottoni CR; Shaha SH; Tokish JM
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Jan; 41(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 23139253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bioabsorbable screw fixation in coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.
    Talbert TW; Green JR; Mukherjee DP; Ogden AL; Mayeux RH
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 14649570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clavicular tunnel widening after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: comparison between single and double clavicular tunnel techniques.
    Jaspers M; Vueghs T; DE Mulder K; Vundelinckx B; Ruette P; VAN Raebroeckx A
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2024 Mar; 90(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 38669650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Acromioclavicular joint stabilization with a double cow-hitch technique compared to a double tight-rope: a biomechanical study.
    Borbas P; Angelella D; Laux CJ; Bachmann E; Ernstbrunner L; Bouaicha S; Wieser K
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Jul; 142(7):1309-1315. PubMed ID: 33479838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomechanical evaluation of anatomical double-bundle coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction secured with knot fixation versus screw fixation.
    Staron JS; Esquivel AO; Pandhi NG; Hanna JD; Lemos SE
    Orthopedics; 2013 Aug; 36(8):e1047-52. PubMed ID: 23937752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomechanical evaluation of coracoid tunnel size and location for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.
    Campbell ST; Heckmann ND; Shin SJ; Wang LC; Tamboli M; Murachovsky J; Tibone JE; Lee TQ
    Arthroscopy; 2015 May; 31(5):825-30. PubMed ID: 25633818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Synthetic coracoclavicular ligament vs. coracoclavicular suspensory construct for treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation: a biomechanical study.
    Lobao MH; Canham RB; Melvani RT; Parks BG; Murthi AM
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1440-1449. PubMed ID: 32081633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systematic review of the treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption comparing number of tunnels and graft type.
    Pill SG; Rush L; Arvesen J; Shanley E; Thigpen CA; Glomset JL; Longstaffe R; Kissenberth MJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7S):S92-S100. PubMed ID: 32643614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Ligament Complex Using Dermal Allograft: A Biomechanical Analysis.
    Morikawa D; Mazzocca AD; Obopilwe E; Cote MP; Kia C; Johnson JD; Imhoff FB; Scheiderer B
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Jan; 36(1):108-115. PubMed ID: 31864562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical Analysis of Suture Anchor vs Tenodesis Screw for FHL Transfer.
    Drakos MC; Gott M; Karnovsky SC; Murphy CI; DeSandis BA; Chinitz N; Grande D; Chahine N
    Foot Ankle Int; 2017 Jul; 38(7):797-801. PubMed ID: 28460573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic repairs for acromioclavicular joint instability: suture button systems without biological augmentation.
    Beitzel K; Obopilwe E; Chowaniec DM; Niver GE; Nowak MD; Hanypsiak BT; Guerra JJ; Arciero RA; Mazzocca AD
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Oct; 39(10):2218-25. PubMed ID: 21841067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.