These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy by detection of minichromosome maintenance protein 5 in bile aspirates. Ayaru L; Stoeber K; Webster GJ; Hatfield AR; Wollenschlaeger A; Okoturo O; Rashid M; Williams G; Pereira SP Br J Cancer; 2008 May; 98(9):1548-54. PubMed ID: 18414413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Next-Generation Sequencing and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Have Comparable Performance Characteristics in the Analysis of Pancreaticobiliary Brushings for Malignancy. Dudley JC; Zheng Z; McDonald T; Le LP; Dias-Santagata D; Borger D; Batten J; Vernovsky K; Sweeney B; Arpin RN; Brugge WR; Forcione DG; Pitman MB; Iafrate AJ J Mol Diagn; 2016 Jan; 18(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 26596524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical utility of stent cytology for the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary neoplasms. Devereaux BM; Fogel EL; Bucksot L; Shelly LA; Lehman GA; Sherman S Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 May; 98(5):1028-31. PubMed ID: 12809824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomised study of dense Infinity cytological brush versus regularly used brush in pancreaticobiliary malignancy. Kylänpää L; Boyd S; Ristimäki A; Lindström O; Udd M; Halttunen J Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016; 51(5):590-3. PubMed ID: 26642244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided brush cytology diagnosis of pancreatobiliary tumors]. Gao L; Man XH; Cai YB; Zheng JM; Zhu MH Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 38(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 19575856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology. A new technique. Venu RP; Geenen JE; Kini M; Hogan WJ; Payne M; Johnson GK; Schmalz MJ Gastroenterology; 1990 Nov; 99(5):1475-9. PubMed ID: 2210255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immunocytochemical detection of p53 protein from pancreatic duct brushings in patients with pancreatic carcinoma. Ishimaru S; Itoh M; Hanada K; Tsuchida A; Iwao T; Kajiyama G Cancer; 1996 Jun; 77(11):2233-9. PubMed ID: 8635089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided brushings in preoperative assessment of pancreaticobiliary strictures: what's new? Athanassiadou P; Grapsa D Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 18323272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided brush cytology for diagnosis of patients with malignant obstruction of the bile duct. Foutch PG; Kerr DM; Harlan JR; Manne RK; Kummet TD; Sanowski RA Am J Gastroenterol; 1990 Jul; 85(7):791-5. PubMed ID: 2164768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study. Fogel EL; deBellis M; McHenry L; Watkins JL; Chappo J; Cramer H; Schmidt S; Lazzell-Pannell L; Sherman S; Lehman GA Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Jan; 63(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 16377319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image cytometry as a discriminatory tool for cytologic specimens obtained by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Sears RJ; Duckworth CW; Decaestecker C; Bourgeois N; Ledent T; Deviere J; Salmon I; Kiss R; Yeaton P Cancer; 1998 Apr; 84(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9570216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usefulness of brush cytology combined with pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: significance of pancreatic juice cytology after brushing. Yamaguchi T; Shirai Y; Nakamura N; Sudo K; Nakamura K; Hironaka S; Hara T; Denda T Pancreas; 2012 Nov; 41(8):1225-9. PubMed ID: 23086246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immunocytochemical detection of p53 protein as an adjunct in cytologic diagnosis from pancreatic duct brushings in mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas. Iwao T; Tsuchida A; Hanada K; Eguchi N; Kajiyama G; Shimamoto F Cancer; 1997 Jun; 81(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 9196015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strategies for improving diagnostic accuracy of biliary strictures. Salomao M; Gonda TA; Margolskee E; Eguia V; Remotti H; Poneros JM; Sethi A; Saqi A Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 123(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 25564796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of p53 immunostaining in pancreatico-biliary brush cytology specimens. Stewart CJ; Burke GM Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Nov; 23(5):308-13. PubMed ID: 11074623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immunocytochemical detection using CDX2: An aid for discerning tumor involvement in ascites cytology. Kobayashi M; Ueyama Y; Nakanishi H; Ishida H; Takahashi E; Nakamura S; Koshikawa T; Yatabe Y Cancer; 2006 Apr; 108(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 16541450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct visualization of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: a multicenter experience. Meining A; Chen YK; Pleskow D; Stevens P; Shah RJ; Chuttani R; Michalek J; Slivka A Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Nov; 74(5):961-8. PubMed ID: 21802675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography standard cytology: 10-y review of the literature. Burnett AS; Calvert TJ; Chokshi RJ J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):304-11. PubMed ID: 23866788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]