These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27182237)

  • 1. Plastibell Device Circumcision versus Bone Cutter Technique in terms of Operative Outcomes and Parent's Satisfaction.
    Mehmood T; Azam H; Tariq M; Iqbal Z; Mehmood H; Shah SA
    Pak J Med Sci; 2016; 32(2):347-50. PubMed ID: 27182237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective randomized controlled trial measuring satisfaction and parents stress after Gomco and Plastibell infant circumcision.
    Alsowayan OS; Al Zahrani AM; Basalelah JH; Al Madi MK; Al Humam AA; Al Otaibi AN; AlKhamis AA; Fadaak KH; Al Suhaibani SS; El Darawany HM
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2024 Feb; 40(1):51. PubMed ID: 38324024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A controlled trial of Gomco versus Plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in Saudi Arabia.
    Bawazir OA
    Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2020 Sep; 7(3):132-135. PubMed ID: 33094142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ten years experience with a novel modification of plastibell circumcision.
    Hammed A; Helal AA; Badway R; Goda SH; Yehya A; Razik MA; Elshamy A; Elsamahy O
    Afr J Paediatr Surg; 2014; 11(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 24841023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Circumcision With the Plastibell Technique: A Descriptive Case Series.
    Ahmed N; Jan ZU; Yasin MD; Aurangzeb M
    Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30601. PubMed ID: 36420227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of complications of circumcision by 'Plastibell device technique' in male neonates and infants.
    Moosa FA; Khan FW; Rao MH
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2010 Aug; 60(8):664-7. PubMed ID: 20726200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gomco vs. plastibell office circumcision: No difference in overall post-procedural complications and healthcare utilization.
    Nicassio L; Ching CB; Klamer B; Sebastião YV; Fuchs M; McLeod DJ; Alpert S; Jayanthi R; DaJusta D
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Feb; 17(1):85.e1-85.e7. PubMed ID: 33281046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Newborn circumcision outcomes: are parents satisfied with the results?
    Freeman JJ; Spencer AU; Drongowski RA; Vandeven CJ; Apgar B; Teitelbaum DH
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2014 Mar; 30(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 24292371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Plastibell circumcision: Comparison between neonates and infants.
    Bawazir OA; Alsaiari WRS
    Urol Ann; 2020; 12(4):347-351. PubMed ID: 33776331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parental evaluation of postoperative outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection by dorsal slit technique: a randomized controlled trial.
    Nagdeve NG; Naik H; Bhingare PD; Morey SM
    J Pediatr Urol; 2013 Oct; 9(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 23122924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Plastibell circumcision of 2,276 male infants: a multi-centre study.
    Jimoh BM; Odunayo IS; Chinwe I; Akinfolarin OO; Oluwafemi A; Olusanmi EJ
    Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 23():35. PubMed ID: 27200140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety of the plastibell circumcision in neonates, infants, and older children.
    Razzaq S; Mehmood MS; Tahir TH; Masood T; Ghaffar S
    Int J Health Sci (Qassim); 2018; 12(5):10-13. PubMed ID: 30202402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neonatal plastibell circumcision: does the thread type matter? a prospective randomized study.
    Altokhais T; Elsarrag A; Khan S; Alshehri A; Albassam A
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Oct; 15(5):562.e1-562.e5. PubMed ID: 31563548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Circumcision with the plastibell device in hooded prepuce or glanular hypospadias.
    Mousavi SA; Mohammadjafari H
    Adv Urol; 2009; 2009():864816. PubMed ID: 19865499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Circumcision: experience at a private hospital in jos, Nigeria.
    Nnamonu MI
    Niger J Surg; 2013 Jan; 19(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 24027408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parental circumcision preferences and early outcome of plastibell circumcision in a Nigerian tertiary hospital.
    Ekwunife OH; Ugwu JO; Okoli CC; Modekwe VI; Osuigwe AN
    Afr J Paediatr Surg; 2015; 12(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 26712290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the plastibell of any haemostatic value after 24 h?
    Ikhisemojie SO; Ademuyiwa AO; Bode CO; Mofikoya BO
    Afr J Paediatr Surg; 2017; 14(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 29487267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acquired phimosis after plastibell circumcision: a preventable consequence.
    Kidger EA; Haider N; Qazi A
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2012 Sep; 94(6):e186-8. PubMed ID: 22943316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective evaluation of plastibell® circumcision in older children.
    Bastos Netto JM; Gonçalves de Araújo J; Noronha MF; Passos BR; Lopes HE; Bessa Jd; Figueiredo AA
    Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 24054384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized trial to assess childhood circumcision with the Plastibell device compared to a conventional dissection technique.
    Fraser IA; Allen MJ; Bagshaw PF; Johnstone M
    Br J Surg; 1981 Aug; 68(8):593-5. PubMed ID: 7023597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.