These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27182294)
1. Reviewing an Original Research Manuscript for the International Journal of Exercise Science: A Guide for Students and Professionals. Simpson KJ Int J Exerc Sci; 2008; 1(2):43-49. PubMed ID: 27182294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers. Navalta JW; Lyons TS Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Dec; 34(4):170-3. PubMed ID: 21098383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts. Enquselassie F Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review at the Health Information and Libraries Journal. Grant MJ Health Info Libr J; 2014 Dec; 31(4):251-3. PubMed ID: 25443027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. JACLP Guide for Manuscript Peer Review: How to Perform a Peer Review and How to Be Responsive to Reviewer Comments. Oldham MA; Kontos N; Baller E; Cerimele JM J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry; 2023; 64(5):468-472. PubMed ID: 36796760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study. Alam M; Kim NA; Havey J; Rademaker A; Ratner D; Tregre B; West DP; Coleman WP Br J Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 165(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 21623749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: how reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers. Kliewer MA; DeLong DM; Freed K; Jenkins CB; Paulson EK; Provenzale JM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1545-50. PubMed ID: 15547189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine. Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From the Editors: Assessing the Lyons TS; Navalta JW Int J Exerc Sci; 2010; 3(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 27182323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sharing Your Practice Expertise: Writing Clinical Manuscripts for Publication. McGrath JM; Brandon D Adv Neonatal Care; 2015 Aug; 15(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 26225587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection. Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Authors' Submission Toolkit: a practical guide to getting your research published. Chipperfield L; Citrome L; Clark J; David FS; Enck R; Evangelista M; Gonzalez J; Groves T; Magrann J; Mansi B; Miller C; Mooney LA; Murphy A; Shelton J; Walson PD; Weigel A Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Aug; 26(8):1967-82. PubMed ID: 20569069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Author perception of peer review. Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metrics for Original Research Articles in the AJR: From First Submission to Final Publication. Rosenkrantz AB; Harisinghani M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1152-6. PubMed ID: 26001223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process. Polak JF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):685-8. PubMed ID: 7645496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part II. Optimizing the manuscript: practical hints for improving the quality of reviews. Levine AM; Heckman JD; Hensinger RN Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():689-97. PubMed ID: 15116659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gynecologic oncology group strategies to improve timeliness of publication. Bialy S; Blessing JA; Stehman FB; Reardon AM; Blaser KM Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):617-23. PubMed ID: 23794406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]