539 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27182696)
1. Wells Rule and d-Dimer Testing to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Individual-Patient Data Meta-analysis.
van Es N; van der Hulle T; van Es J; den Exter PL; Douma RA; Goekoop RJ; Mos IC; Galipienzo J; Kamphuisen PW; Huisman MV; Klok FA; Büller HR; Bossuyt PM
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Aug; 165(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 27182696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The original and simplified Wells rules and age-adjusted D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
van Es N; Kraaijpoel N; Klok FA; Huisman MV; Den Exter PL; Mos IC; Galipienzo J; Büller HR; Bossuyt PM
J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Apr; 15(4):678-684. PubMed ID: 28106338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.
Righini M; Van Es J; Den Exter PL; Roy PM; Verschuren F; Ghuysen A; Rutschmann OT; Sanchez O; Jaffrelot M; Trinh-Duc A; Le Gall C; Moustafa F; Principe A; Van Houten AA; Ten Wolde M; Douma RA; Hazelaar G; Erkens PM; Van Kralingen KW; Grootenboers MJ; Durian MF; Cheung YW; Meyer G; Bounameaux H; Huisman MV; Kamphuisen PW; Le Gal G
JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(11):1117-24. PubMed ID: 24643601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is stand-alone D-dimer testing safe to rule out acute pulmonary embolism?
van Es N; van der Hulle T; Büller HR; Klok FA; Huisman MV; Galipienzo J; Di Nisio M
J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Feb; 15(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27873439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrospective validation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule in 'PE unlikely' patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
Crane S; Jaconelli T; Eragat M
Eur J Emerg Med; 2018 Jun; 25(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 28002070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of the Wells clinical prediction rule for pulmonary embolism in older ambulatory adults.
Schouten HJ; Geersing GJ; Oudega R; van Delden JJ; Moons KG; Koek HL
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2014 Nov; 62(11):2136-41. PubMed ID: 25366538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Primary Care: Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of "Gestalt" and the Wells Rule.
Hendriksen JM; Lucassen WA; Erkens PM; Stoffers HE; van Weert HC; Büller HR; Hoes AW; Moons KG; Geersing GJ
Ann Fam Med; 2016 May; 14(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 27184993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PO-07 - Excluding pulmonary embolism in cancer patients using the Wells rule and age-adjusted D-dimer testing: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
van Es N; van der Hulle T; van Es J; den Exter PL; Douma RA; Goekoop RJ; Mos IC; Garcia JG; Kamphuisen PW; Huisman MV; Klok FA; Büller HR; Bossuyt PM
Thromb Res; 2016 Apr; 140 Suppl 1():S179. PubMed ID: 27161697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study.
Douma RA; Mos IC; Erkens PM; Nizet TA; Durian MF; Hovens MM; van Houten AA; Hofstee HM; Klok FA; ten Cate H; Ullmann EF; Büller HR; Kamphuisen PW; Huisman MV;
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 154(11):709-18. PubMed ID: 21646554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of the age-adjusted cut-off for D-dimer in patients with cancer and suspected pulmonary embolism.
Wilts IT; Le Gal G; Den Exter PL; Van Es J; Carrier M; Planquette B; Büller HR; Righini M; Huisman MV; Kamphuisen PW
Thromb Res; 2017 Apr; 152():49-51. PubMed ID: 28226257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and Efficiency of Diagnostic Strategies for Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Clinically Relevant Patient Subgroups : A Systematic Review and Individual-Patient Data Meta-analysis.
Stals MAM; Takada T; Kraaijpoel N; van Es N; Büller HR; Courtney DM; Freund Y; Galipienzo J; Le Gal G; Ghanima W; Huisman MV; Kline JA; Moons KGM; Parpia S; Perrier A; Righini M; Robert-Ebadi H; Roy PM; van Smeden M; Wells PS; de Wit K; Geersing GJ; Klok FA
Ann Intern Med; 2022 Feb; 175(2):244-255. PubMed ID: 34904857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded.
van Es J; Mos I; Douma R; Erkens P; Durian M; Nizet T; van Houten A; Hofstee H; ten Cate H; Ullmann E; Büller H; Huisman M; Kamphuisen PW
Thromb Haemost; 2012 Jan; 107(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 22072293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Qualitative point-of-care D-dimer testing compared with quantitative D-dimer testing in excluding pulmonary embolism in primary care.
Lucassen WA; Erkens PM; Geersing GJ; Büller HR; Moons KG; Stoffers HE; van Weert HC
J Thromb Haemost; 2015 Jun; 13(6):1004-9. PubMed ID: 25845618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Noninvasive diagnostic work-up for suspected acute pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.
Stals MAM; Moumneh T; Ainle FN; Aujesky D; van Bemmel T; Bertoletti L; Bistervels IM; Chauleur C; Couturaud F; van Dooren YPA; Elias A; Faber LM; Le Gall C; Hofstee HMA; van der Hulle T; Kruip MJHA; Maignan M; Mairuhu ATA; Middeldorp S; Le Moigne E; Nijkeuter M; van der Pol LM; Robert-Ebadi H; Roy PM; Sanchez O; Schmidt J; van Smeden M; Tromeur C; Wolde MT; Righini M; Le Gal G; Huisman MV; Klok FA
J Thromb Haemost; 2023 Mar; 21(3):606-615. PubMed ID: 36696189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical decision rules for excluding pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.
Lucassen W; Geersing GJ; Erkens PM; Reitsma JB; Moons KG; Büller H; van Weert HC
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(7):448-60. PubMed ID: 21969343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography.
van Belle A; Büller HR; Huisman MV; Huisman PM; Kaasjager K; Kamphuisen PW; Kramer MH; Kruip MJ; Kwakkel-van Erp JM; Leebeek FW; Nijkeuter M; Prins MH; Sohne M; Tick LW;
JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 16403929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity and clinical utility of the simplified Wells rule for assessing clinical probability for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
Douma RA; Gibson NS; Gerdes VE; Büller HR; Wells PS; Perrier A; Le Gal G
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jan; 101(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 19132208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex-specific performance of pre-imaging diagnostic algorithms for pulmonary embolism.
van Mens TE; van der Pol LM; van Es N; Bistervels IM; Mairuhu ATA; van der Hulle T; Klok FA; Huisman MV; Middeldorp S
J Thromb Haemost; 2018 May; 16(5):858-865. PubMed ID: 29460484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of clinical decision rule, D-dimer and spiral computed tomography in patients with malignancy, previous venous thromboembolism, COPD or heart failure and in older patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
Sohne M; Kruip MJ; Nijkeuter M; Tick L; Kwakkel H; Halkes SJ; Huisman MV; Buller HR;
J Thromb Haemost; 2006 May; 4(5):1042-6. PubMed ID: 16689757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of a diagnostic algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in an emergency department.
Galipienzo J; Garcia de Tena J; Flores J; Alvarez C; Garcia-Avello A; Arribas I
Rom J Intern Med; 2012; 50(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 23330286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
