These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

876 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27182835)

  • 41. Evaluation of Changes in Grams of Sugar Sold After the Implementation of the Seattle Sweetened Beverage Tax.
    Powell LM; Leider J; Oddo VM
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132271. PubMed ID: 34739061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Reduce Overweight and Obesity in Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.
    Nakhimovsky SS; Feigl AB; Avila C; O'Sullivan G; Macgregor-Skinner E; Spranca M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0163358. PubMed ID: 27669014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Targeted Beverage Taxes Influence Food and Beverage Purchases among Households with Preschool Children.
    Ford CN; Ng SW; Popkin BM
    J Nutr; 2015 Aug; 145(8):1835-43. PubMed ID: 26063069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Changes in Prices After an Excise Tax to Sweetened Sugar Beverages Was Implemented in Mexico: Evidence from Urban Areas.
    Colchero MA; Salgado JC; Unar-Munguía M; Molina M; Ng S; Rivera-Dommarco JA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144408. PubMed ID: 26675166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Corporations' use and misuse of evidence to influence health policy: a case study of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation.
    Fooks GJ; Williams S; Box G; Sacks G
    Global Health; 2019 Sep; 15(1):56. PubMed ID: 31551086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of the sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Oakland, United States, 2015-2019: A quasi-experimental and cost-effectiveness study.
    White JS; Basu S; Kaplan S; Madsen KA; Villas-Boas SB; Schillinger D
    PLoS Med; 2023 Apr; 20(4):e1004212. PubMed ID: 37071600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Measuring weight outcomes for obesity intervention strategies: the case of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax.
    Lin BH; Smith TA; Lee JY; Hall KD
    Econ Hum Biol; 2011 Dec; 9(4):329-41. PubMed ID: 21940223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Impact of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes by Household Income: A Multi-City Comparison of Nielsen Purchasing Data.
    Barker AR; Mazzucca S; An R
    Nutrients; 2022 Feb; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 35267897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Patterns and trends in the intake distribution of manufactured and homemade sugar-sweetened beverages in pre-tax Mexico, 1999-2012.
    Aburto TC; Poti JM; Popkin BM
    Public Health Nutr; 2018 Dec; 21(18):3296-3306. PubMed ID: 30348245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Association of a Sweetened Beverage Tax With Purchases of Beverages and High-Sugar Foods at Independent Stores in Philadelphia.
    Bleich SN; Dunn CG; Soto MJ; Yan J; Gibson LA; Lawman HG; Mitra N; Lowery CM; Peterhans A; Hua SV; Roberto CA
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jun; 4(6):e2113527. PubMed ID: 34129022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Examining the policy process of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Ireland.
    Crosbie E; Florence D; Nanthaseang M; Godoy L
    Health Policy; 2022 Aug; 126(8):738-743. PubMed ID: 35718666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cost-Effectiveness of a US National Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax With a Multistakeholder Approach: Who Pays and Who Benefits.
    Wilde P; Huang Y; Sy S; Abrahams-Gessel S; Jardim TV; Paarlberg R; Mozaffarian D; Micha R; Gaziano T
    Am J Public Health; 2019 Feb; 109(2):276-284. PubMed ID: 30571305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. SSB taxes and diet quality in US preschoolers: estimated changes in the 2010 Healthy Eating Index.
    Ford CN; Poti JM; Ng SW; Popkin BM
    Pediatr Obes; 2017 Apr; 12(2):146-154. PubMed ID: 27059293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The impact of the Oakland sugar-sweetened beverage tax on price promotions of sugar-sweetened and alternative beverages.
    El-Sayed OM; Powell LM
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0285956. PubMed ID: 37294798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Own-price, cross-price, and expenditure elasticities on sugar-sweetened beverages in Guatemala.
    Chacon V; Paraje G; Barnoya J; Chaloupka FJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205931. PubMed ID: 30346999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Progress in the Pacific on sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: a systematic review of policy changes from 2000 to 2019.
    Teng A; Snowdon W; Win Tin ST; Genç M; Na'ati E; Puloka V; Signal L; Wilson N
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2021 Aug; 45(4):376-384. PubMed ID: 34097355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Are intentions to change, policy awareness, or health knowledge related to changes in dietary intake following a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in South Africa? A before-and-after study.
    Essman M; Zimmer C; Carpentier FD; Swart EC; Taillie LS
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2022 Oct; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 36307849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health.
    von Philipsborn P; Stratil JM; Burns J; Busert LK; Pfadenhauer LM; Polus S; Holzapfel C; Hauner H; Rehfuess E
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 6(6):CD012292. PubMed ID: 31194900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Simulating international tax designs on sugar-sweetened beverages in Mexico.
    Salgado Hernández JC; Ng SW
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0253748. PubMed ID: 34411108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Would A National Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax In The United States Be Well Targeted?
    Valizadeh P; Ng SW
    Am J Agric Econ; 2021 May; 103(3):961-986. PubMed ID: 35505903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.