These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27183561)

  • 1. Meuwissen et al. on Genomic Selection.
    de Koning DJ
    Genetics; 2016 May; 203(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 27183561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The application of genomic selection in pig cross breeding.
    Yang AQ; Chen B; Ran ML; Yang GM; Zeng C
    Yi Chuan; 2020 Feb; 42(2):145-152. PubMed ID: 32102771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genome-wide association and genomic selection in animal breeding.
    Hayes B; Goddard M
    Genome; 2010 Nov; 53(11):876-83. PubMed ID: 21076503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic selection.
    Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 18076469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolutionary genetics: 150 years of natural selection. Preface.
    Joshi A; Mueller LD
    J Genet; 2008 Dec; 87(4):319-20. PubMed ID: 19280754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of molecular genetics in the improvement of agricultural populations.
    Dekkers JC; Hospital F
    Nat Rev Genet; 2002 Jan; 3(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11823788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection in backcross programmes.
    Hospital F
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2005 Jul; 360(1459):1503-11. PubMed ID: 16048792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic selection of seed weight based on low-density SCAR markers in soybean.
    Shu YJ; Yu DS; Wang D; Bai X; Zhu YM; Guo CH
    Genet Mol Res; 2013 Jul; 12(3):2178-88. PubMed ID: 23884761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of marker-assisted selection in animal breeding and biotechnology.
    Williams JL
    Rev Sci Tech; 2005 Apr; 24(1):379-91. PubMed ID: 16110903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linkage disequilibrium in crossbred and pure line chickens.
    Fu W; Dekkers JC; Lee WR; Abasht B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):11. PubMed ID: 25887184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with single markers and marker haplotypes in cattle.
    Hayes BJ; Chamberlain AJ; McPartlan H; Macleod I; Sethuraman L; Goddard ME
    Genet Res; 2007 Aug; 89(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 18208627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative trait nucleotide analysis using Bayesian model selection. 2005.
    Blangero J; Göring HH; Kent JW; Williams JT; Peterson CP; Almasy L; Dyer TD
    Hum Biol; 2009 Dec; 81(5-6):829-47. PubMed ID: 20504200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of quantitative trait loci underlying milk traits in Spanish dairy sheep using linkage plus combined linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis approaches.
    Garcia-Gámez E; Gutiérrez-Gil B; Suarez-Vega A; de la Fuente LF; Arranz JJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6059-69. PubMed ID: 23810588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding and predicting complex traits: knowledge from cattle.
    Kemper KE; Goddard ME
    Hum Mol Genet; 2012 Oct; 21(R1):R45-51. PubMed ID: 22899652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of the optimal number of markers and individuals in a training population necessary for maximum prediction accuracy in F
    Peixoto LA; Bhering LL; Cruz CD
    Genet Mol Res; 2016 Nov; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27886337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic dissection and prediction of heading date in perennial ryegrass.
    Fè D; Cericola F; Byrne S; Lenk I; Ashraf BH; Pedersen MG; Roulund N; Asp T; Janss L; Jensen CS; Jensen J
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Nov; 16():921. PubMed ID: 26559662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.