These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27184590)

  • 1. A measure of association for ordered categorical data in population-based studies.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):812-831. PubMed ID: 27184590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measures of agreement between many raters for ordinal classifications.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3116-32. PubMed ID: 26095449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the influence of rater and subject characteristics on measures of agreement for ordinal ratings.
    Nelson KP; Mitani AA; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(20):3181-3199. PubMed ID: 28612356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the effects of rater and subject factors on measures of association.
    Nelson KP; Mitani AA; Edwards D
    Biom J; 2018 May; 60(3):639-656. PubMed ID: 29349801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Summary measures of agreement and association between many raters' ordinal classifications.
    Mitani AA; Freer PE; Nelson KP
    Ann Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):677-685.e4. PubMed ID: 29029991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring intrarater association between correlated ordinal ratings.
    Nelson KP; Zhou TJ; Edwards D
    Biom J; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1687-1701. PubMed ID: 32529683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the reliability of diagnostic tests in population-based agreement studies.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(6):617-26. PubMed ID: 20128018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A paired kappa to compare binary ratings across two medical tests.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(17):3272-3287. PubMed ID: 31099902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring rater bias in diagnostic tests with ordinal ratings.
    Kim C; Lin X; Nelson KP
    Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(17):4014-4033. PubMed ID: 33969509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammography, routine ultrasonography in pregnancy, and PSA screenings in Italy.
    Favaretti C; De Pieri P
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 11495379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Best combination of multiple diagnostic tests for screening purposes.
    Qin J; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2905-19. PubMed ID: 20862668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A unified approach for assessing agreement for continuous and categorical data.
    Lin L; Hedayat AS; Wu W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):629-52. PubMed ID: 17613645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different ranking approaches defining association and agreement measures of paired ordinal data.
    Svensson E
    Stat Med; 2012 Nov; 31(26):3104-17. PubMed ID: 22714677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling rater diagnostic skills in binary classification processes.
    Lin X; Chen H; Edwards D; Nelson KP
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(4):557-571. PubMed ID: 29094378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical description of interrater variability in ordinal ratings.
    Nelson JC; Pepe MS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):475-96. PubMed ID: 11191261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of preventive technologies in Germany: case studies of mammography, prostate cancer screening, and fetal ultrasound.
    Perleth M; Busse R; Gibis B; Brand A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 11495377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A crossed random effects modeling approach for estimating diagnostic accuracy from ordinal ratings without a gold standard.
    Xie Y; Chen Z; Albert PS
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(20):3472-85. PubMed ID: 23529923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying rater variation for ordinal data using a rating scale model.
    Zhang S; Petersen JH
    Stat Med; 2018 Jun; 37(14):2223-2237. PubMed ID: 29663479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bootstrap-based procedures for inference in nonparametric receiver-operating characteristic curve regression analysis.
    Rodríguez-Álvarez MX; Roca-Pardiñas J; Cadarso-Suárez C; Tahoces PG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):740-764. PubMed ID: 29233083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.