192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27184656)
1. Clinical application of S-Detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: a study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologist.
Kim K; Song MK; Kim EK; Yoon JH
Ultrasonography; 2017 Jan; 36(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 27184656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of Computer-Aided Diagnosis on Breast Ultrasonography: Evaluation of Diagnostic Performances and Agreement of Radiologists According to Different Levels of Experience.
Cho E; Kim EK; Song MK; Yoon JH
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):209-216. PubMed ID: 28762552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Which supplementary imaging modality should be used for breast ultrasonography? Comparison of the diagnostic performance of elastography and computer-aided diagnosis.
Lee SE; Moon JE; Rho YH; Kim EK; Yoon JH
Ultrasonography; 2017 Apr; 36(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 27764908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A computer-aided diagnosis system using artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and characterization of breast masses on ultrasound: Added value for the inexperienced breast radiologist.
Park HJ; Kim SM; La Yun B; Jang M; Kim B; Jang JY; Lee JY; Lee SH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(3):e14146. PubMed ID: 30653149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of a Deep Learning Framework-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis System on the Diagnostic Performance of Radiologists in Differentiating between Malignant and Benign Masses on Breast Ultrasonography.
Choi JS; Han BK; Ko ES; Bae JM; Ko EY; Song SH; Kwon MR; Shin JH; Hahn SY
Korean J Radiol; 2019 May; 20(5):749-758. PubMed ID: 30993926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the radiologist need to rescan the breast lesion to validate the final BI-RADS US assessment made on the static images in the diagnostic setting?
Hu Y; Mei J; Jiang X; Gu R; Liu F; Yang Y; Wang H; Shen S; Jia H; Liu Q; Gong C
Cancer Manag Res; 2019; 11():4607-4615. PubMed ID: 31191021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The feasibility of a novel computer-aided classification system for the characterisation and diagnosis of breast masses on ultrasound: a single-centre preliminary test study.
Gu Y; Xu W; Liu Y; An X; Li J; Cong L; Zhu L; He X; Wang H; Jiang Y
Clin Radiol; 2023 Jul; 78(7):e516-e525. PubMed ID: 37069025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial Intelligence in BI-RADS Categorization of Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: Can We Omit Excessive Follow-ups and Biopsies?
Guldogan N; Taskin F; Icten GE; Yilmaz E; Turk EB; Erdemli S; Parlakkilic UT; Turkoglu O; Aribal E
Acad Radiol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38087719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions.
Zou X; Wang J; Lan X; Lin Q; Han F; Liu L; Li A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2065-71. PubMed ID: 27262521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies of US-BI-RADS 4a lesions through a deep learning method for residents-in-training: a cross-sectional study.
Zhao C; Xiao M; Liu H; Wang M; Wang H; Zhang J; Jiang Y; Zhu Q
BMJ Open; 2020 Jun; 10(6):e035757. PubMed ID: 32513885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the fifth edition BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon with comparison of fourth and fifth edition diagnostic performance using video clips.
Yoon JH; Kim MJ; Lee HS; Kim SH; Youk JH; Jeong SH; Kim YM
Ultrasonography; 2016 Oct; 35(4):318-26. PubMed ID: 27184655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.
Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses.
Abdullah N; Mesurolle B; El-Khoury M; Kao E
Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):665-72. PubMed ID: 19567644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. American college of radiology ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system ultrasound (O-RADS): Diagnostic performance and inter-reviewer agreement for ovarian masses in children.
Wang H; Wang L; An S; Ma Q; Tu Y; Shang N; Pan Y
Front Pediatr; 2023; 11():1091735. PubMed ID: 36969276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists.
Neuschler EI; Butler R; Young CA; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Donlan P; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Lavin PT; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Schilling KJ; Tucker FL; Dogan BE
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 29178816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer aided classification system for breast ultrasound based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).
Shen WC; Chang RF; Moon WK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1688-98. PubMed ID: 17681678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Prospective Study on the Value of Ultrasound Microflow Assessment to Distinguish Malignant from Benign Solid Breast Masses: Association between Ultrasound Parameters and Histologic Microvessel Densities.
Park AY; Kwon M; Woo OH; Cho KR; Park EK; Cha SH; Song SE; Lee JH; Cha J; Son GS; Seo BK
Korean J Radiol; 2019 May; 20(5):759-772. PubMed ID: 30993927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simple rules for ultrasonographic subcategorization of BI-RADS®-US 4 breast masses.
Jales RM; Sarian LO; Torresan R; Marussi EF; Alvares BR; Derchain S
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1231-5. PubMed ID: 23540948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
