192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27184656)
21. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
Kim H; Cha JH; Oh HY; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 23086698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of the effect of computer aided diagnosis system on breast ultrasound for inexperienced radiologists in describing and determining breast lesions.
Lee J; Kim S; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Park GE
Med Ultrason; 2019 Aug; 21(3):239-245. PubMed ID: 31476202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.
Berg WA; Cosgrove DO; Doré CJ; Schäfer FK; Svensson WE; Hooley RJ; Ohlinger R; Mendelson EB; Balu-Maestro C; Locatelli M; Tourasse C; Cavanaugh BC; Juhan V; Stavros AT; Tardivon A; Gay J; Henry JP; Cohen-Bacrie C;
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 22282182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Differing benefits of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis for breast US according to workflow and experience level.
Lee SE; Han K; Youk JH; Lee JE; Hwang JY; Rho M; Yoon J; Kim EK; Yoon JH
Ultrasonography; 2022 Oct; 41(4):718-727. PubMed ID: 35850498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The added value of S-detect in the diagnostic accuracy of breast masses by senior and junior radiologist groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen P; Tong J; Lin T; Wang Y; Yu Y; Chen M; Yang G
Gland Surg; 2022 Dec; 11(12):1946-1960. PubMed ID: 36654955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management--follow-up and outcome.
Raza S; Chikarmane SA; Neilsen SS; Zorn LM; Birdwell RL
Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):773-81. PubMed ID: 18647850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound.
Niu L; Bao L; Zhu L; Tan Y; Xu X; Shan Y; Liu J; Zhu Q; Jiang C; Shen Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2871-2880. PubMed ID: 30912178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Feasibility of computer-assisted diagnosis for breast ultrasound: the results of the diagnostic performance of S-detect from a single center in China.
Zhao C; Xiao M; Jiang Y; Liu H; Wang M; Wang H; Sun Q; Zhu Q
Cancer Manag Res; 2019; 11():921-930. PubMed ID: 30774422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [The value of ultrasound classification in BI-RADS category 4 of breast complex cystic masses].
Yao JP; Niu LJ; Wang Y; Geng CY; Chang Q; Chen Y; Zhu L
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 40(9):672-675. PubMed ID: 30293391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic Value of Breast Lesions Between Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis System and Experienced Radiologists: Comparison the Performance Between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients.
Xiao M; Zhao C; Li J; Zhang J; Liu H; Wang M; Ouyang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang Y; Zhu Q
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1070. PubMed ID: 32733799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The Added Value of a Computer-Aided Diagnosis System in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Lesions by Radiologists With Different Experience.
Wei Q; Zeng SE; Wang LP; Yan YJ; Wang T; Xu JW; Zhang MY; Lv WZ; Dietrich CF; Cui XW
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jun; 41(6):1355-1363. PubMed ID: 34432320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ultrasound positive predictive values by BI-RADS categories 3-5 for solid masses: An independent reader study.
Stavros AT; Freitas AG; deMello GGN; Barke L; McDonald D; Kaske T; Wolverton D; Honick A; Stanzani D; Padovan AH; Moura APC; de Campos MCV
Eur Radiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4307-4315. PubMed ID: 28396996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Choi CH; Kim EK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1491-8. PubMed ID: 22173328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance of Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Ultrasonography for Detection of Breast Lesions Less and More Than 2 cm: Prospective Comparative Study.
Yongping L; Zhou P; Juan Z; Yongfeng Z; Liu W; Shi Y
JMIR Med Inform; 2020 Mar; 8(3):e16334. PubMed ID: 32130149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification.
Gülsün M; Demirkazik FB; Ariyürek M
Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 12927667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Breast non-mass-like lesions on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: Feature analysis, breast image reporting and data system classification assessment.
Xu P; Yang M; Liu Y; Li YP; Zhang H; Shao GR
World J Clin Cases; 2020 Feb; 8(4):700-712. PubMed ID: 32149054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Value of Lesion Size as an Adjunct to the BI-RADS-MRI 2013 Descriptors in the Diagnosis of Solitary Breast Masses.
Kawai M; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Iima M; Onishi N; Ohashi A; Sakaguchi R; Toi M; Togashi K
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2018 Jul; 17(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 29213007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
