These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27185695)

  • 1. Reliability of a faculty evaluated scoring system for anesthesiology resident applicants (Original Investigation).
    Gumbert SD; Normand KC; Artime CA; Nwokolo OO; Williams G; Guzman-Reyes S; Ghebremichael S; Sridhar S; Graham-Carlson AD; Pawelek O; Jain R; Hagberg CA; Pivalizza EG
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Jun; 31():131-6. PubMed ID: 27185695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. RESIDENTS AS INTERVIEWERS: A COMPARISON OF RESIDENT AND FACULTY EVALUATIONS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE RESIDENCY APPLICANTS.
    McGurk K; Hashim A; Bergner C; Schindlbeck M; Dyer S
    J Emerg Med; 2023 Mar; 64(3):366-370. PubMed ID: 37019498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of anesthesiology resident and faculty electronic evaluations before and after implementation of automated electronic reminders.
    Blum JM; Kheterpal S; Tremper KK
    J Clin Anesth; 2006 Jun; 18(4):264-7. PubMed ID: 16797427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anesthesiology resident personality type correlates with faculty assessment of resident performance.
    Schell RM; Dilorenzo AN; Li HF; Fragneto RY; Bowe EA; Hessel EA
    J Clin Anesth; 2012 Nov; 24(7):566-72. PubMed ID: 23101772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of faculty-specific electronic reminders on faculty compliance with daily resident evaluations: a retrospective study.
    Rusa R; Klatil F; Fu R; Swide CE
    J Clin Anesth; 2009 May; 21(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 19464607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process.
    Brothers TE; Wetherholt S
    J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):378-85. PubMed ID: 18063273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing Residency Applicants' Communication and Professionalism: Standardized Video Interview Scores Compared to Faculty Gestalt.
    Schnapp BH; Ritter D; Kraut AS; Fallon S; Westergaard MC
    West J Emerg Med; 2019 Jan; 20(1):132-137. PubMed ID: 30643616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The predictive value of pre-recruitment achievement on resident performance in anesthesiology.
    Chen F; Arora H; Martinelli SM; Teeter E; Mayer D; Zvara DA; Passannante A; Smith KA
    J Clin Anesth; 2017 Jun; 39():139-144. PubMed ID: 28494890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standardized Interview Scoring Methodology for Neurosurgical Residency Applicant Selection.
    Soni P; Davison MA; Battisti EA; Schmidt ES; Benzel EC; Steinmetz MP; Schlenk RP; Benzil DL
    Neurosurgery; 2022 Dec; 91(6):e155-e159. PubMed ID: 36094260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Redesign of the System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities in Anesthesiology Residency Training (SETQ Smart).
    Lombarts KM; Ferguson A; Hollmann MW; Malling B; ; Arah OA
    Anesthesiology; 2016 Nov; 125(5):1056-1065. PubMed ID: 27606931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Introducing a Novel Applicant Ranking Tool to Predict Future Resident Performance: A Pilot Study.
    Bowe SN; Weitzel EK; Hannah WN; Fitzgerald BM; Kraus GP; Nagy CJ; Harrison SA
    Mil Med; 2017 Jan; 182(1):e1514-e1520. PubMed ID: 28051967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synchronous collection of multisource feedback evaluations does not increase inter-rater reliability.
    Garra G; Thode H
    Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Oct; 18 Suppl 2():S65-70. PubMed ID: 21999561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does Masked Interviewing Encourage Holistic Review in Residency Selection? A Mixed-Methods Study.
    Clapp JT; Heins SJ; Gaulton TG; Kleid MA; Lane-Fall MB; Aysola J; Baranov DY; Fleisher LA; Gordon EKB
    Teach Learn Med; 2024; 36(3):369-380. PubMed ID: 37097188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The oral examination in anaesthetic resident evaluation.
    Eagle CJ; Martineau R; Hamilton K
    Can J Anaesth; 1993 Oct; 40(10):947-53. PubMed ID: 8222035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A first look at the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education anesthesiology milestones: implementation of self-evaluation in a large residency program.
    Ross FJ; Metro DG; Beaman ST; Cain JG; Dowdy MM; Apfel A; Jeong JH; Ibinson JW
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Aug; 32():17-24. PubMed ID: 27290937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of Cognitive Simulation During Anesthesiology Resident Applicant Interviews to Assess Higher-Order Thinking.
    Kulig AW; Blanchard RD
    J Grad Med Educ; 2016 Jul; 8(3):417-21. PubMed ID: 27413447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Faculty evaluations of resident medical knowledge: can they be used to predict American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination performance?
    Elfenbein DM; Sippel RS; McDonald R; Watson T; Scarborough JE; Migaly J
    Am J Surg; 2015 Jun; 209(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 25686512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of future success in otolaryngology residency applicants.
    Chole RA; Ogden MA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Aug; 138(8):707-12. PubMed ID: 22911295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of virtual vs. in-person interviews among neurosurgery residency applicants.
    Alomari S; Lubelski D; Feghali J; Brem H; Witham T; Huang J
    J Clin Neurosci; 2022 Jul; 101():63-66. PubMed ID: 35561432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of TEE simulation in teaching basic echocardiography skills to senior anesthesiology residents.
    Jelacic S; Bowdle A; Togashi K; VonHomeyer P
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Aug; 27(4):670-5. PubMed ID: 23849523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.