843 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27187051)
1. Assisted reproductive technology and perinatal outcomes: conventional versus discordant-sibling design.
Dhalwani NN; Boulet SL; Kissin DM; Zhang Y; McKane P; Bailey MA; Hood ME; Tata LJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):710-716.e2. PubMed ID: 27187051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology.
Martin AS; Chang J; Zhang Y; Kawwass JF; Boulet SL; McKane P; Bernson D; Kissin DM; Jamieson DJ;
Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 28292615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology.
Wennberg AL; Opdahl S; Bergh C; Aaris Henningsen AK; Gissler M; Romundstad LB; Pinborg A; Tiitinen A; Skjærven R; Wennerholm UB
Fertil Steril; 2016 Oct; 106(5):1142-1149.e14. PubMed ID: 27399261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).
Declercq E; Luke B; Belanoff C; Cabral H; Diop H; Gopal D; Hoang L; Kotelchuck M; Stern JE; Hornstein MD
Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):888-95. PubMed ID: 25660721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance -
United States, 2013.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Dec; 64(11):1-25. PubMed ID: 26633040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Separating parental and treatment contributions to perinatal health after fresh and frozen embryo transfer in assisted reproduction: A cohort study with within-sibship analysis.
Westvik-Johari K; Romundstad LB; Lawlor DA; Bergh C; Gissler M; Henningsen AA; Håberg SE; Wennerholm UB; Tiitinen A; Pinborg A; Opdahl S
PLoS Med; 2021 Jun; 18(6):e1003683. PubMed ID: 34170923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morbidity and mortality among very preterm singletons following fertility treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a population cohort study.
Wang AY; Chughtai AA; Lui K; Sullivan EA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Feb; 17(1):50. PubMed ID: 28148237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment.
D'Angelo DV; Whitehead N; Helms K; Barfield W; Ahluwalia IB
Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):314-320.e2. PubMed ID: 21718990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preterm birth among primiparas.
Dunietz GL; Holzman C; McKane P; Li C; Boulet SL; Todem D; Kissin DM; Copeland G; Bernson D; Sappenfield WM; Diamond MP
Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):974-979.e1. PubMed ID: 25707336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Qin J; Liu X; Sheng X; Wang H; Gao S
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jan; 105(1):73-85.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26453266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gestational age-specific perinatal mortality rates for assisted reproductive technology (ART) and other births.
Chughtai AA; Wang AY; Hilder L; Li Z; Lui K; Farquhar C; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):320-327. PubMed ID: 29140454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interpregnancy interval and singleton pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer.
Quinn MM; Rosen MP; Allen IE; Huddleston HG; Cedars MI; Fujimoto VY
Fertil Steril; 2019 Jun; 111(6):1145-1150. PubMed ID: 30955846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dizygotic twin pregnancies after medically assisted reproduction and after natural conception: maternal and perinatal outcomes.
Bensdorp AJ; Hukkelhoven CW; van der Veen F; Mol BW; Lambalk CB; van Wely M
Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):371-377.e2. PubMed ID: 27108393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Donor oocytes are associated with preterm birth when compared to fresh autologous in vitro fertilization cycles in singleton pregnancies.
Dude AM; Yeh JS; Muasher SJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):660-5. PubMed ID: 27343953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pinborg A; Wennerholm UB; Romundstad LB; Loft A; Aittomaki K; Söderström-Anttila V; Nygren KG; Hazekamp J; Bergh C
Hum Reprod Update; 2013; 19(2):87-104. PubMed ID: 23154145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2017.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Zhang Y; Jewett A; Boulet SL; Warner L; Kroelinger CD; Barfield WD
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2020 Dec; 69(9):1-20. PubMed ID: 33332294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
