244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27188033)
1. The contemporary landscape of journal publishing.
McKenna L
Collegian; 2016; 23(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 27188033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
Shim EH; Parekh V
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Why and how to avoid a desk-rejection.
Lake ET
Res Nurs Health; 2020 Apr; 43(2):141-142. PubMed ID: 32103510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Predatory Publishing: What You Don't Know Can Hurt You.
Nolfi DA; Lockhart JS; Myers CR
Nurse Educ; 2015; 40(5):217-9. PubMed ID: 25997152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer Review: The Science of Nursing Education Depends on It.
Patterson BJ
Nurs Educ Perspect; 2015; 36(2):75. PubMed ID: 29194129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peering Into the Peer Review Process and Acknowledging Those Who Do It Well.
Ramstrand N; Fatone S; Dillon MP; Hafner BJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Jun; 43(3):247-249. PubMed ID: 31172882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A good manuscript review for the European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing.
Jaarsma T; Strömberg A; Årestedt K; Broström A; Kärner A; Mårtensson J; Moons P; Thylén I; Thompson DR
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2013 Apr; 12(2):102-3. PubMed ID: 23463617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Innovation, journal reviewers, and journal editors the game is worth the candle.
Popp RL
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 46(7):1360-1. PubMed ID: 16198856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The process of external peer review of manuscripts submitted for publication to Enfermería Clínica].
Moreno-Casbas T; Fuentelsaz-Gallego C; Ruzafa-Martínez M; Puigblanqué-Reyes E
Enferm Clin; 2008; 18(5):229-31. PubMed ID: 18840330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Publishing coronavirology: Peering into peer(less?) review.
Pederson T
FASEB J; 2020 Aug; 34(8):9825-9827. PubMed ID: 32803811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
Liesegang TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Publisher's Perspective on Journal and Book Publishing.
Nahlen D; Clark S
Semin Oncol Nurs; 2018 Nov; 34(4):381-385. PubMed ID: 30270139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
Jefferson T; Shashok K
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Predatory Journals: A Potential Threat to Nursing Practice and Science.
Bourgault AM
Crit Care Nurse; 2019 Aug; 39(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 31371362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Your paper has been accepted for publication.
Munk-Jørgensen P; Christiansen B; Licht RW
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Jan; 121(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20059451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The scientific journal in the post-truth era.
Casson RJ; Al-Qureshi S
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 48(2):153-154. PubMed ID: 32173987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. CONSORT and beyond.
Blackstone EH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 16872939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A suggested code of conduct for editors of peer-reviewed journals.
Glover D
J Wound Care; 2006 Feb; 15(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 16521599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
