226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27188569)
1. Fundamentals of estimating sample size.
Malone HE; Nicholl H; Coyne I
Nurse Res; 2016 May; 23(5):21-5. PubMed ID: 27188569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How many do I need? Basic principles of sample size estimation.
Devane D; Begley CM; Clarke M
J Adv Nurs; 2004 Aug; 47(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 15238124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The importance of a priori sample size estimation in strength and conditioning research.
Beck TW
J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Aug; 27(8):2323-37. PubMed ID: 23880657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Planning significant and meaningful research in exercise science: estimating sample size.
Thomas JR; Lochbaum MR; Landers DM; He C
Res Q Exerc Sport; 1997 Mar; 68(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 9094761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sample size estimation for the sorcerer's apprentice. Guide for the uninitiated and intimidated.
Ray JG; Vermeulen MJ
Can Fam Physician; 1999 Jul; 45():1732-9. PubMed ID: 10424273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical power and estimation of the number of required subjects for a study based on the t-test: a surgeon's primer.
Livingston EH; Cassidy L
J Surg Res; 2005 Jun; 126(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 15919413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concepts in sample size determination.
Rao UK
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 23422614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determining Sample Size for Accurate Estimation of the Squared Multiple Correlation Coefficient.
Algina J; Olejnik S
Multivariate Behav Res; 2000 Jan; 35(1):119-37. PubMed ID: 26777233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range.
Wan X; Wang W; Liu J; Tong T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():135. PubMed ID: 25524443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding sample size determination in nursing research.
Hayat MJ
West J Nurs Res; 2013 Aug; 35(7):943-56. PubMed ID: 23552393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A Review on the Use of Effect Size in Nursing Research].
Kang H; Yeon K; Han ST
J Korean Acad Nurs; 2015 Oct; 45(5):641-9. PubMed ID: 26582109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Step-by-Step Process on Sample Size Determination for Medical Research.
Bujang MA
Malays J Med Sci; 2021 Apr; 28(2):15-27. PubMed ID: 33958957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Caution regarding the choice of standard deviations to guide sample size calculations in clinical trials.
Chen H; Zhang N; Lu X; Chen S
Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 23794405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Planning sample sizes when effect sizes are uncertain: The power-calibrated effect size approach.
McShane BB; Böckenholt U
Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 26651984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample Size Calculation: Inaccurate A Priori Assumptions for Nuisance Parameters Can Greatly Affect the Power of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Tavernier E; Giraudeau B
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132578. PubMed ID: 26173007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical power and sample size estimation for headache research: an overview and power calculation tools.
Houle TT; Penzien DB; Houle CK
Headache; 2005 May; 45(5):414-8. PubMed ID: 15953257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maximum information designs.
Lachin JM
Clin Trials; 2005; 2(5):453-64. PubMed ID: 16315649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy in parameter estimation in cluster randomized designs.
Pornprasertmanit S; Schneider WJ
Psychol Methods; 2014 Sep; 19(3):356-79. PubMed ID: 25046449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Introduction of a User-oriented Application for Biometrical Sample Size Calculation in Clinical and Epidemiological Trials].
Geis B; Tulka S; Knippschild S; Krummenauer F
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2021 Feb; 238(2):179-185. PubMed ID: 31117147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sample size and power estimation for studies with health related quality of life outcomes: a comparison of four methods using the SF-36.
Walters SJ
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 May; 2():26. PubMed ID: 15161494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
