136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27188653)
1. Selective attention modulates the effect of target location probability on redundant signal processing.
Chang TY; Little DR; Yang CT
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1603-24. PubMed ID: 27188653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of cueing on attentional focus in perceptual decision making.
Yang CT; Little DR; Hsu CC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2256-75. PubMed ID: 24939235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relative saliency in change signals affects perceptual comparison and decision processes in change detection.
Yang CT
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1708-28. PubMed ID: 21767050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relative change probability affects the decision process of detecting multiple feature changes.
Yang CT; Chang TY; Wu CJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1365-85. PubMed ID: 23148473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative salience affects the process of detecting changes in orientation and luminance.
Yang CT; Hsu YF; Huang HY; Yeh YY
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Nov; 138(3):377-89. PubMed ID: 21974871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metrical rhythm implicitly orients attention in time as indexed by improved target detection and left inferior parietal activation.
Bolger D; Coull JT; Schön D
J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):593-605. PubMed ID: 24168222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
Rodway P
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attention modulates sensory suppression during back movements.
Van Hulle L; Juravle G; Spence C; Crombez G; Van Damme S
Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):420-9. PubMed ID: 23454431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhanced reactivity to visual stimuli in deaf individuals.
Bottari D; Nava E; Ley P; Pavani F
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2010; 28(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 20404406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual search and location probability learning from variable perspectives.
Jiang YV; Swallow KM; Capistrano CG
J Vis; 2013 May; 13(6):13. PubMed ID: 23716120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The attentional white bear phenomenon: the mandatory allocation of attention to expected distractor locations.
Tsal Y; Makovski T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):351-63. PubMed ID: 16634675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time course of visual attention across perceptual levels and objects.
Srivastava P; Kumar D; Srinivasan N
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 20937502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visuospatial attention and redundancy gain.
Miller J; Beutinger D; Ulrich R
Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):254-62. PubMed ID: 19066946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can we perceive two colors at the same time? A direct test of Huang and Pashler's (2007) Boolean map theory of visual attention.
Fitousi D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1532-1550. PubMed ID: 30684206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selection in spatial working memory is independent of perceptual selective attention, but they interact in a shared spatial priority map.
Hedge C; Oberauer K; Leonards U
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2653-68. PubMed ID: 26341873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patients with Parkinson׳s disease are less affected than healthy persons by relevant response-unrelated features in visual search.
Verleger R; Koerbs A; Graf J; Śmigasiewicz K; Schroll H; Hamker FH
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():38-47. PubMed ID: 25038550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When two faces are not better than one: Serial limited-capacity processing with redundant-target faces.
Fitousi D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Nov; 83(8):3118-3134. PubMed ID: 34180033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does temporal preparation facilitate visual processing in a selective manner? Evidence from attentional capture.
Seibold VC; Rolke B
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():51-61. PubMed ID: 24950348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
