These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27188653)
21. Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex. Dassanayake TL; Michie PT; Fulham R Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():9-16. PubMed ID: 27114044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays. Smith PL; Ratcliff R; Wolfgang BJ Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1297-320. PubMed ID: 15066392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pain draws visual attention to its location: experimental evidence for a threat-related bias. Van Damme S; Crombez G; Lorenz J J Pain; 2007 Dec; 8(12):976-82. PubMed ID: 17822961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection. Fagioli S; Macaluso E J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition. Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of spatial congruency on saccade and visual discrimination performance in a dual-task paradigm. Moehler T; Fiehler K Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():100-11. PubMed ID: 25449339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evidence for a positive relationship between working-memory capacity and detection of low-prevalence targets in visual search. Schwark J; Sandry J; Dolgov I Perception; 2013; 42(1):112-4. PubMed ID: 23678621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Active search for multiple targets is inefficient. Verghese P Vision Res; 2012 Dec; 74():61-71. PubMed ID: 22929812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of spatial and selective attention on basic multisensory integration. Gondan M; Blurton SP; Hughes F; Greenlee MW J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1887-97. PubMed ID: 21967270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Valid cues for auditory or somatosensory targets affect their perception: a signal detection approach. Van Hulle L; Van Damme S; Crombez G Perception; 2013; 42(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 23700960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture. Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention. Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inhibition of return affects contrast sensitivity. Sapir A; Jackson K; Butler J; Paul MA; Abrams RA Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1305-16. PubMed ID: 24321008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex. Scalf PE; Dux PE; Marois R J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2593-604. PubMed ID: 21281093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Instruction-driven processing in human perceptual learning. Navarro A; Arriola N; Alonso G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1583-605. PubMed ID: 26339859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]