These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27188692)

  • 21. Priming a natural or human-made environment directs attention to context-congruent threatening stimuli.
    Young SG; Brown CM; Ambady N
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(5):927-33. PubMed ID: 22132869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The lurking snake in the grass: interference of snake stimuli in visually taxing conditions.
    Soares SC
    Evol Psychol; 2012 Apr; 10(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 22947633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Snakes and cats in the flower bed: fast detection is not specific to pictures of fear-relevant animals.
    Lipp OV; Derakshan N; Waters AM; Logies S
    Emotion; 2004 Sep; 4(3):233-50. PubMed ID: 15456393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bullets versus burgers: is it threat or relevance that captures attention?
    de Oca BM; Black AA
    Am J Psychol; 2013; 126(3):287-300. PubMed ID: 24027943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual features and perceptual context modulate attention towards evolutionarily relevant threatening stimuli: Electrophysiological evidence.
    Grassini S; Railo H; Valli K; Revonsuo A; Koivisto M
    Emotion; 2019 Mar; 19(2):348-364. PubMed ID: 29578746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Disentangling the facilitating and hindering effects of threat-related stimuli - A visual search study.
    Zsido AN; Matuz A; Inhof O; Darnai G; Budai T; Bandi S; Csatho A
    Br J Psychol; 2020 Nov; 111(4):665-682. PubMed ID: 31633809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attentional bias in high- and low-anxious individuals: evidence for threat-induced effects on engagement and disengagement.
    Massar SA; Mol NM; Kenemans JL; Baas JM
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Aug; 25(5):805-17. PubMed ID: 21824022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Conserved evolutionary history for quick detection of threatening faces.
    Kawai N; Kubo K; Masataka N; Hayakawa S
    Anim Cogn; 2016 May; 19(3):655-60. PubMed ID: 26714818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Distracted by danger: Temporal and spatial dynamics of visual selection in the presence of threat.
    Mulckhuyse M; Dalmaijer ES
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):315-24. PubMed ID: 26546018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Snake pictures draw more early attention than spider pictures in non-phobic women: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Van Strien JW; Eijlers R; Franken IH; Huijding J
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Feb; 96():150-7. PubMed ID: 24374241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Autonomic arousal and attentional orienting to visual threat are predicted by awareness.
    Hedger N; Adams WJ; Garner M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):798-806. PubMed ID: 25867508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. But what about the Empress of Racnoss? The allocation of attention to spiders and Doctor Who in a visual search task is predicted by fear and expertise.
    Purkis HM; Lester KJ; Field AP
    Emotion; 2011 Dec; 11(6):1484-8. PubMed ID: 21707142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of imagery in threat-related perceptual decision making.
    Imbriano G; Sussman TJ; Jin J; Mohanty A
    Emotion; 2020 Dec; 20(8):1495-1501. PubMed ID: 31192666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spiders do not evoke greater early posterior negativity in the event-related potential as snakes.
    He H; Kubo K; Kawai N
    Neuroreport; 2014 Sep; 25(13):1049-53. PubMed ID: 25026534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does Threat Have an Advantage After All? - Proposing a Novel Experimental Design to Investigate the Advantages of Threat-Relevant Cues in Visual Processing.
    Zsido AN; Csatho A; Matuz A; Stecina D; Arato A; Inhof O; Darnai G
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2217. PubMed ID: 31611835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Searching for threat.
    Tipples J; Young AW; Quinlan P; Broks P; Ellis AW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):1007-26. PubMed ID: 12188507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Context learning for threat detection.
    Szekely A; Rajaram S; Mohanty A
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Dec; 31(8):1525-1542. PubMed ID: 27775483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Deconstructing the snake: the relative roles of perception, cognition, and emotion on threat detection.
    LoBue V
    Emotion; 2014 Aug; 14(4):701-11. PubMed ID: 24708497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detection and distraction effects for threatening information in social phobia and change after treatment.
    Baños RM; Quero S; Botella C
    Depress Anxiety; 2008; 25(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 17252570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rapid detection of snakes by Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata): an evolutionarily predisposed visual system.
    Shibasaki M; Kawai N
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 May; 123(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 19450020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.