1143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27188835)
1. Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 27188835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 29529653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What Is the Frequency of Fracture of Ceramic Components in THA? Results from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 1997 to 2017.
Hallan G; Fenstad AM; Furnes O
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1254-1261. PubMed ID: 32348085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB; Satterwhite KL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High Revision Rate for Large-head Metal-on-metal THA at a Mean of 7.1 Years: A Registry Study.
Seppänen M; Laaksonen I; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Puhto AP; Kettunen J; Leskinen J; Manninen M; Mäkelä K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 29480891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High rate of infection after aseptic revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
Wyles CC; Van Demark RE; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Feb; 472(2):509-16. PubMed ID: 23846604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revisions of Modular Metal-on-metal THA Have a High Risk of Early Complications.
Jennings JM; White S; Martin JR; Yang CC; Miner TM; Dennis DA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):344-350. PubMed ID: 30794222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complications Are Not Increased With Acetabular Revision of Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Penrose CT; Seyler TM; Wellman SS; Bolognesi MP; Lachiewicz PF
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2134-42. PubMed ID: 26987866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years.
Hannouche D; Devriese F; Delambre J; Zadegan F; Tourabaly I; Sedel L; Chevret S; Nizard R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 26341897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What Is the Long-term Survival for Primary THA With Small-head Metal-on-metal Bearings?
de Steiger R; Peng A; Lewis P; Graves S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1231-1237. PubMed ID: 29432270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With Metasul Bearings Provides Good Results in Active Young Patients: A Concise Followup.
Delaunay CP; Putman S; Puliéro B; Bégin M; Migaud H; Bonnomet F
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2126-33. PubMed ID: 27278679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Migaud H; Putman S; Kern G; Isida R; Girard J; Ramdane N; Delaunay CP; Hamadouche M;
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2190-9. PubMed ID: 27255729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What Is the Risk of THA Revision for ARMD in Patients with Non-metal-on-metal Bearings? A Study from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry.
de Steiger RN; Hatton A; Peng Y; Graves S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1244-1253. PubMed ID: 32345846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients.
Asaad A; Hart A; Khoo MM; Ilo K; Schaller G; Black JD; Muirhead-Allwood S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3770-8. PubMed ID: 25981716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the Risk of Rerevision Vary Between Porous Tantalum Cups and Other Cementless Designs After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?
Laaksonen I; Lorimer M; Gromov K; Rolfson O; Mäkelä KT; Graves SE; Malchau H; Mohaddes M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3015-3022. PubMed ID: 28646360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do alumina matrix composite bearings decrease hip noises and bearing fractures at a minimum of 5 years after THA?
Baek SH; Kim WK; Kim JY; Kim SY
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3796-802. PubMed ID: 26126991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
