These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27188835)

  • 1. Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
    Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 27188835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.
    Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 29529653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No Difference in Revision Rates and High Survival Rates in Large-head Metal-on-metal THA Versus Metal-on-polyethylene THA: Long-term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Spierenburg W; de Vries AJ; Boomsma MF; Siepelinga S; Wetzels T; van Raaij JJAM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Jul; 482(7):1173-1182. PubMed ID: 38084856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Is the Frequency of Fracture of Ceramic Components in THA? Results from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 1997 to 2017.
    Hallan G; Fenstad AM; Furnes O
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1254-1261. PubMed ID: 32348085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB; Satterwhite KL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High Revision Rate for Large-head Metal-on-metal THA at a Mean of 7.1 Years: A Registry Study.
    Seppänen M; Laaksonen I; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Puhto AP; Kettunen J; Leskinen J; Manninen M; Mäkelä K
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 29480891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High rate of infection after aseptic revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Wyles CC; Van Demark RE; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Feb; 472(2):509-16. PubMed ID: 23846604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revisions of Modular Metal-on-metal THA Have a High Risk of Early Complications.
    Jennings JM; White S; Martin JR; Yang CC; Miner TM; Dennis DA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):344-350. PubMed ID: 30794222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complications Are Not Increased With Acetabular Revision of Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Penrose CT; Seyler TM; Wellman SS; Bolognesi MP; Lachiewicz PF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2134-42. PubMed ID: 26987866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years.
    Hannouche D; Devriese F; Delambre J; Zadegan F; Tourabaly I; Sedel L; Chevret S; Nizard R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 26341897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
    Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What Is the Long-term Survival for Primary THA With Small-head Metal-on-metal Bearings?
    de Steiger R; Peng A; Lewis P; Graves S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1231-1237. PubMed ID: 29432270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With Metasul Bearings Provides Good Results in Active Young Patients: A Concise Followup.
    Delaunay CP; Putman S; Puliéro B; Bégin M; Migaud H; Bonnomet F
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2126-33. PubMed ID: 27278679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Migaud H; Putman S; Kern G; Isida R; Girard J; Ramdane N; Delaunay CP; Hamadouche M;
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2190-9. PubMed ID: 27255729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What Is the Risk of THA Revision for ARMD in Patients with Non-metal-on-metal Bearings? A Study from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Hatton A; Peng Y; Graves S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1244-1253. PubMed ID: 32345846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients.
    Asaad A; Hart A; Khoo MM; Ilo K; Schaller G; Black JD; Muirhead-Allwood S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3770-8. PubMed ID: 25981716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the Risk of Rerevision Vary Between Porous Tantalum Cups and Other Cementless Designs After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?
    Laaksonen I; Lorimer M; Gromov K; Rolfson O; Mäkelä KT; Graves SE; Malchau H; Mohaddes M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3015-3022. PubMed ID: 28646360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 57.