These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2718910)

  • 1. Analysis of manual lifting tasks: a qualitative alternative to the NIOSH work practices guide.
    Keyserling WM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 Mar; 50(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 2718910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variable Lifting Index (VLI): A New Method for Evaluating Variable Lifting Tasks.
    Waters T; Occhipinti E; Colombini D; Alvarez-Casado E; Fox R
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):695-711. PubMed ID: 26646300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical lifting energy consumption in work activities designed by means of the "revised NIOSH lifting equation".
    Ranavolo A; Varrecchia T; Rinaldi M; Silvetti A; Serrao M; Conforto S; Draicchio F
    Ind Health; 2017 Oct; 55(5):444-454. PubMed ID: 28781290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New procedure for assessing sequential manual lifting jobs using the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
    Waters TR; Lu ML; Occhipinti E
    Ergonomics; 2007 Nov; 50(11):1761-70. PubMed ID: 17972201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.
    Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Fine LJ
    Ergonomics; 1993 Jul; 36(7):749-76. PubMed ID: 8339717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between low back discomfort ratings and the NIOSH lifting index.
    Wang MJ; Garg A; Chang YC; Shih YC; Yeh WY; Lee CL
    Hum Factors; 1998 Sep; 40(3):509-15. PubMed ID: 9849108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Cumulative Lifting Index (CULI) for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation: Quantifying Risk for Workers With Job Rotation.
    Garg A; Kapellusch JM
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):683-94. PubMed ID: 26896406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assessment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low-back disorders.
    Marras WS; Fine LJ; Ferguson SA; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):229-45. PubMed ID: 9973881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of methods assessing the physical demands of manual lifting in scaffolding.
    van der Beek AJ; Erik Mathiassen S; Windhorst J; Burdorf A
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Mar; 36(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 15694076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Work-Related Risk Assessment According to the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation: A Preliminary Study Using a Wearable Inertial Sensor and Machine Learning.
    Donisi L; Cesarelli G; Coccia A; Panigazzi M; Capodaglio EM; D'Addio G
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33917206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and validity of self-reported assessment of exposure and outcome variables for manual lifting tasks: a preliminary investigation.
    Yeung SS; Genaidy AM; Karwowski W; Leung PC
    Appl Ergon; 2002 Sep; 33(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 12236655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.
    Lu ML; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Davis KG
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):667-82. PubMed ID: 26822795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Usability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
    Dempsey PG
    Ergonomics; 2002 Oct; 45(12):817-28. PubMed ID: 12487684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health care concerns related to lifting: an inside look at intervention strategies.
    Laflin K; Aja D
    Am J Occup Ther; 1995 Jan; 49(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 7892903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of the NIOSH Lifting Equation: a psychophysical and biomechanical investigation.
    Elfeituri FE; Taboun SM
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2002; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 12067513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comprehensive lifting model: beyond the NIOSH lifting equation.
    Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
    Ergonomics; 1997 Sep; 40(9):916-27. PubMed ID: 9306742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of measurements for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. Applied Ergonomics 29(6) 433-438.
    Burdorf A; van der Beek A
    Appl Ergon; 1999 Aug; 30(4):369-71. PubMed ID: 10416850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Four assessment tools of ergonomics interventions: case study at an electric utility's warehouse system.
    Marklin RW; Wilzbacher JR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 10635543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physiological and psychophysical comparison between a lifting task with identical weight but different coupling factors.
    Adams KJ; DeBeliso M; Sevene-Adams PG; Berning JM; Miller T; Tollerud DJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Feb; 24(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 20072069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using NIOSH lifting guide decreases risks of back injuries.
    Liles DH; Mahajan P
    Occup Health Saf; 1985 Feb; 54(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 3982769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.