These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27189140)

  • 1. Phase-reference monitoring in coherent-state discrimination assisted by a photon-number resolving detector.
    Bina M; Allevi A; Bondani M; Olivares S
    Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():26025. PubMed ID: 27189140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Homodyne-like detection for coherent state-discrimination in the presence of phase noise.
    Bina M; Allevi A; Bondani M; Olivares S
    Opt Express; 2017 May; 25(9):10685-10692. PubMed ID: 28468439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-Shot Non-Gaussian Measurements for Optical Phase Estimation.
    DiMario MT; Becerra FE
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Sep; 125(12):120505. PubMed ID: 33016710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phase detection at the quantum limit with multiphoton Mach-Zehnder interferometry.
    Pezzé L; Smerzi A; Khoury G; Hodelin JF; Bouwmeester D
    Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Nov; 99(22):223602. PubMed ID: 18233283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sub-shot-noise-limit discrimination of on-off keyed coherent signals via a quantum receiver with a superconducting transition edge sensor.
    Tsujino K; Fukuda D; Fujii G; Inoue S; Fujiwara M; Takeoka M; Sasaki M
    Opt Express; 2010 Apr; 18(8):8107-14. PubMed ID: 20588655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Useful multiparticle entanglement and sub-shot-noise sensitivity in experimental phase estimation.
    Krischek R; Schwemmer C; Wieczorek W; Weinfurter H; Hyllus P; Pezzé L; Smerzi A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2011 Aug; 107(8):080504. PubMed ID: 21929154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phase noise estimation using Bayesian inference for continuous-variable quantum key distribution.
    Zhao W; Guo Y; Zhang L; Huang D
    Opt Express; 2019 Feb; 27(3):1838-1853. PubMed ID: 30732231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single-shot discrimination of coherent states beyond the standard quantum limit.
    Thekkadath GS; Sempere-Llagostera S; Bell BA; Patel RB; Kim MS; Walmsley IA
    Opt Lett; 2021 Jun; 46(11):2565-2568. PubMed ID: 34061057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hybrid quantum receiver for quadrature amplitude modulation coherent-state discrimination beating the classical limit.
    Chen T; Li K; Zuo Y; Zhu B
    Appl Opt; 2018 Feb; 57(4):817-822. PubMed ID: 29400758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Joint estimation of phase and phase diffusion for quantum metrology.
    Vidrighin MD; Donati G; Genoni MG; Jin XM; Kolthammer WS; Kim MS; Datta A; Barbieri M; Walmsley IA
    Nat Commun; 2014 Apr; 5():3532. PubMed ID: 24727938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robust Measurement for the Discrimination of Binary Coherent States.
    DiMario MT; Becerra FE
    Phys Rev Lett; 2018 Jul; 121(2):023603. PubMed ID: 30085718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phase estimation via quantum interferometry for noisy detectors.
    Spagnolo N; Vitelli C; Lucivero VG; Giovannetti V; Maccone L; Sciarrino F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Jun; 108(23):233602. PubMed ID: 23003955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self consistent, absolute calibration technique for photon number resolving detectors.
    Avella A; Brida G; Degiovanni IP; Genovese M; Gramegna M; Lolli L; Monticone E; Portesi C; Rajteri M; Rastello ML; Taralli E; Traina P; White M
    Opt Express; 2011 Nov; 19(23):23249-57. PubMed ID: 22109203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-coherent complex field reconstruction with in-phase and quadrature delay detection without a direct-detection branch.
    Tselniker I; Nazarathy M; Ezra SB; Li J; Leuthold J
    Opt Express; 2012 Jul; 20(14):15452-73. PubMed ID: 22772241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Demonstration of coherent-state discrimination using a displacement-controlled photon-number-resolving detector.
    Wittmann C; Andersen UL; Takeoka M; Sych D; Leuchs G
    Phys Rev Lett; 2010 Mar; 104(10):100505. PubMed ID: 20366409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RF-subcarrier-assisted four-state continuous-variable QKD based on coherent detection.
    Qu Z; Djordjevic IB; Neifeld MA
    Opt Lett; 2016 Dec; 41(23):5507-5510. PubMed ID: 27906225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterizing photon number statistics using conjugate optical homodyne detection.
    Qi B; Lougovski P; Williams BP
    Opt Express; 2020 Jan; 28(2):2276-2290. PubMed ID: 32121921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deterministic superresolution with coherent states at the shot noise limit.
    Distante E; Ježek M; Andersen UL
    Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Jul; 111(3):033603. PubMed ID: 23909318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deterministic Quantum Phase Estimation beyond N00N States.
    Nielsen JAH; Neergaard-Nielsen JS; Gehring T; Andersen UL
    Phys Rev Lett; 2023 Mar; 130(12):123603. PubMed ID: 37027843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Super-resolving quantum lidar: entangled coherent-state sources with binary-outcome photon counting measurement suffice to beat the shot-noise limit.
    Wang Q; Hao L; Zhang Y; Xu L; Yang C; Yang X; Zhao Y
    Opt Express; 2016 Mar; 24(5):5045-5056. PubMed ID: 29092333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.