208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27189157)
1. Steerable versus non-steerable sheaths during pulmonary vein isolation: impact of left atrial enlargement on the catheter-tissue contact force.
Masuda M; Fujita M; Iida O; Okamoto S; Ishihara T; Nanto K; Kanda T; Shiraki T; Sunaga A; Matsuda Y; Uematsu M
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Oct; 47(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 27189157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of Contact Force Monitoring in Acute Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using an Anatomic Approach. A Randomized Study.
Pedrote A; Arana-Rueda E; Arce-León A; Acosta J; Gómez-Pulido F; Martos-Maine JL; Frutos-López M; Sánchez-Brotons J; García-Riesco L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2016 Apr; 39(4):361-9. PubMed ID: 26768692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Catheter-tissue contact force values do not impact mid-term clinical outcome following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Stabile G; Solimene F; Calò L; Anselmino M; Castro A; Pratola C; Golia P; Bottoni N; Grandinetti G; De Simone A; Schillaci V; Bertaglia E; De Ponti R
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 25378035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wall thickness of the pulmonary vein-left atrial junction rather than electrical information as the major determinant of dormant conduction after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation.
Iso K; Okumura Y; Watanabe I; Nagashima K; Sonoda K; Kogawa R; Sasaki N; Takahashi K; Kurokawa S; Nakai T; Ohkubo K; Hirayama A
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Sep; 46(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 27221713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-year outcomes and reconnection patterns after initial contact force guided pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Nair GM; Yeo C; MacDonald Z; Ainslie MP; Alqarawi WA; Nery PB; Redpath CJ; Sadek M; Spence S; Green MS; Birnie DH
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Sep; 28(9):984-993. PubMed ID: 28635046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of steerable sheaths on unblinded contact force during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Deyell MW; Wen G; Laksman Z; Bennett MT; Chakrabarti S; Yeung-Lai-Wah JA; Krahn AD; Andrade JG
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2020 Apr; 57(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 30701358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Kautzner J; Neuzil P; Lambert H; Peichl P; Petru J; Cihak R; Skoda J; Wichterle D; Wissner E; Yulzari A; Kuck KH
Europace; 2015 Aug; 17(8):1229-35. PubMed ID: 26041872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Real-time contact force sensing for pulmonary vein isolation in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: procedural and 1-year results.
Marijon E; Fazaa S; Narayanan K; Guy-Moyat B; Bouzeman A; Providencia R; Treguer F; Combes N; Bortone A; Boveda S; Combes S; Albenque JP
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 24433324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of left atrial volume and pulmonary vein anatomy on outcome of nMARQ™ catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Stabile G; Anselmino M; Soldati E; De Ruvo E; Solimene F; Iuliano A; Sciarra L; Bongiorni MG; Calò L; Gaita F
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Mar; 48(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 27714605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo contact force measurements and correlation with left atrial anatomy during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Schluermann F; Krauss T; Biermann J; Hartmann M; Trolese L; Pache G; Bode C; Asbach S
Europace; 2015 Oct; 17(10):1526-32. PubMed ID: 25745072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of steerable sheaths on contact forces and reconnection sites in ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.
Ullah W; Hunter RJ; McLean A; Dhinoja M; Earley MJ; Sporton S; Schilling RJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 25346514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective characterization of catheter-tissue contact force at different anatomic sites during antral pulmonary vein isolation.
Kumar S; Morton JB; Lee J; Halloran K; Spence SJ; Gorelik A; Hepworth G; Kistler PM; Kalman JM
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2012 Dec; 5(6):1124-9. PubMed ID: 23087399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrophysiological findings following pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency catheter guided by contact-force and second-generation cryoballoon: lessons from repeat ablation procedures.
Ciconte G; Velagić V; Mugnai G; Saitoh Y; Irfan G; Hunuk B; Ströker E; Conte G; Sieira J; Di Giovanni G; Baltogiannis G; Brugada P; de Asmundis C; Chierchia GB
Europace; 2016 Jan; 18(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 26445821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Superior efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation with online contact force measurement persists after the learning period: a prospective case control study.
Wolf M; Saenen JB; Bories W; Miljoen HP; Nullens S; Vrints CJ; Sarkozy A
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Sep; 43(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 25956480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of the anatomic characteristics of the pulmonary vein ostium, the learning curve, and the use of a steerable sheath on success of pulmonary vein isolation with a novel multielectrode ablation catheter.
Brunelli M; Raffa S; Große A; Wauters K; Menoni S; Schreiber M; Geller JC
Europace; 2012 Mar; 14(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 22024599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized comparison of contact force-guided versus conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation: prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of electrical reconnections and clinical outcomes.
Nakamura K; Naito S; Sasaki T; Nakano M; Minami K; Nakatani Y; Ikeda K; Yamashita E; Kumagai K; Funabashi N; Oshima S
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Dec; 44(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 26387117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low contact force and force-time integral predict early recovery and dormant conduction revealed by adenosine after pulmonary vein isolation.
le Polain de Waroux JB; Weerasooriya R; Anvardeen K; Barbraud C; Marchandise S; De Meester C; Goesaert C; Reis I; Scavee C
Europace; 2015 Jun; 17(6):877-83. PubMed ID: 25618742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pulmonary vein anatomy predicts freedom from atrial fibrillation using remote magnetic navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation.
Sohns C; Sohns JM; Bergau L; Sossalla S; Vollmann D; Lüthje L; Staab W; Dorenkamp M; Harrison JL; O'Neill MD; Lotz J; Zabel M
Europace; 2013 Aug; 15(8):1136-42. PubMed ID: 23512156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pulmonary vein reconnection following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the second-generation cryoballoon versus open-irrigated radiofrequency: results of a multicenter analysis.
Aryana A; Singh SM; Mugnai G; de Asmundis C; Kowalski M; Pujara DK; Cohen AI; Singh SK; Fuenzalida CE; Prager N; Bowers MR; O'Neill PG; Brugada P; d'Avila A; Chierchia GB
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Dec; 47(3):341-348. PubMed ID: 27475949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Operator-blinded contact force monitoring during pulmonary vein isolation using conventional and steerable sheaths.
Kimura T; Takatsuki S; Oishi A; Negishi M; Kashimura S; Katsumata Y; Nishiyama T; Nishiyama N; Tanimoto Y; Aizawa Y; Fukuda K
Int J Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 177(3):970-6. PubMed ID: 25449509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
