327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27189238)
1. First-in-human robotic percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main stenosis.
Mahmud E; Dominguez A; Bahadorani J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 88(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 27189238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system.
Granada JF; Delgado JA; Uribe MP; Fernandez A; Blanco G; Leon MB; Weisz G
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Apr; 4(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 21511227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion.
Harrison J; Ang L; Naghi J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Patel MP; Reeves RR; Mahmud E
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jul; 19(5 Pt A):526-531. PubMed ID: 29221959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prophylactic use of intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: will the Impella LP 2.5 device show superiority in a clinical randomized study?
Syed AI; Kakkar A; Torguson R; Li Y; Ben-Dor I; Collins SD; Lemesle G; Maluenda G; Xue Z; Scheinowitz M; Kaneshige K; Satler LF; Kent KM; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Lindsay J; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2010; 11(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 20347798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention--filling an unmet need.
Carrozza JP
J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2012 Feb; 5(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 22068433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Mahmud E; Naghi J; Ang L; Harrison J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 10(13):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 28683937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Real-world supported unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention with impella device; data from the USpella registry.
Schreiber T; Wah Htun W; Blank N; Telila T; Mercado N; Briasoulis A; Kaki A; Kondur A; Munir A; Grines C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Oct; 90(4):576-581. PubMed ID: 28417594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.
Weisz G; Metzger DC; Caputo RP; Delgado JA; Marshall JJ; Vetrovec GW; Reisman M; Waksman R; Granada JF; Novack V; Moses JW; Carrozza JP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 61(15):1596-600. PubMed ID: 23500318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Staged High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Impella Support after On-Pump Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Arora S; Bahekar AA
Tex Heart Inst J; 2016 Oct; 43(5):423-427. PubMed ID: 27777528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience.
Dixon SR; Henriques JP; Mauri L; Sjauw K; Civitello A; Kar B; Loyalka P; Resnic FS; Teirstein P; Makkar R; Palacios IF; Collins M; Moses J; Benali K; O'Neill WW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Feb; 2(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 19463408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report.
Smitson CC; Ang L; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M; Mahmud E
J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 30(4):152-156. PubMed ID: 29335386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Supported percutaneous coronary intervention using a novel 6-Fr intra-aortic balloon pump catheter via the brachial artery in a nonagenarian patient with an abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Takahashi A; Taniguchi N
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jun; 77(7):1045-8. PubMed ID: 21413123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transradial complex left main trifurcation intervention.
Hussein H; Fang HY; Wu CJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Nov; 76(5):679-83. PubMed ID: 20824633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility and efficacy of the 2.5 L and 3.8 L impella percutaneous left ventricular support device during high-risk, percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
Spiro J; Venugopal V; Raja Y; Ludman PF; Townend JN; Doshi SN
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 May; 85(6):981-9. PubMed ID: 24408882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Axillary Impella insertion under regional nerve block: A case report.
Raghunathan D; Hernandez N; Rajagopal K; Jumean M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Mar; 95(4):E108-E110. PubMed ID: 31228327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impella ventricular assist device: use in patients at high risk for coronary interventions: successful multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in a 62-year-old high-risk patient.
Marella PC; Lassetter JE; Heuser RR
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2011; 12(1):69.e9-12. PubMed ID: 21036108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-center experience with the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device to support patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.
Al-Husami W; Yturralde F; Mohanty G; Pastore C; Lotun K; Venesy D; Waxman S; Pyne C; Gossman D; Nesto R; Piemonte T
J Invasive Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 20(6):319-22. PubMed ID: 18523330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvement in hemodynamics with a new, larger-volume (50 cc) intra-aortic balloon for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.
Nair PK; Scolieri S; Lee AB
J Invasive Cardiol; 2011 Apr; 23(4):162-6. PubMed ID: 21474851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of intravascular ultrasound in unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention.
Das P; Meredith I
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2007 Jan; 5(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 17187459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A case of robotic assisted percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main coronary artery in a patient with very late baffle stenosis after surgical correction of anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery.
Hirai T; Jacob D; Main ML; Grantham JA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Apr; 95(5):920-923. PubMed ID: 31250510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
