These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2718972)

  • 1. Maxillary superimposition: a comparison of three methods for cephalometric evaluation of growth and treatment change.
    Nielsen IL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 May; 95(5):422-31. PubMed ID: 2718972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation of maxillary superimposition techniques using metallic implants.
    Doppel DM; Damon WM; Joondeph DR; Little RM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Feb; 105(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 8311038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The validity of superimposing oblique cephalometric radiographs to assess tooth movement: an implant study.
    Sakima MT; Sakima CG; Melsen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):344-53. PubMed ID: 15356499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitation of maxillary remodeling. 2. Masking of remodeling effects when an "anatomical" method of superimposition is used in the absence of metallic implants.
    Baumrind S; Korn EL; Ben-Bassat Y; West EE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Jun; 91(6):463-74. PubMed ID: 3473926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
    Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The variability and reliability of two maxillary and mandibular superimposition techniques. Part II.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Nov; 106(5):463-71. PubMed ID: 7977186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of general facial growth, maxillary and mandibular growth and treatment changes ("Structural analysis").
    Nielsen IL
    Int Orthod; 2011 Dec; 9(4):388-409. PubMed ID: 22032962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
    Lenza MA; Carvalho AA; Lenza EB; Lenza MG; Torres HM; Souza JB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 26154453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of maxillary position. Implant vs cephalometric methods.
    Verayannont P; Hägg U; Wong RW; McGrath C; Yeung S
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):876-83. PubMed ID: 20578858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Average surface remodeling of the maxillary base and the orbital floor in female subjects from 8 to 25 years. An implant study.
    Iseri H; Solow B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 7817961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Growth displacement of the maxilla in girls studied by the implant method.
    Iseri H; Solow B
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 Nov; 12(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 2086259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A preliminary assessment of cephalometric orthodontic superimposition.
    Goel S; Bansal M; Kalra A
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Apr; 26(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 15130046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
    Arat ZM; Rübendüz M; Akgül AA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in the location of the human mandibular foramen as a function of growth and vertical facial type.
    Epars JF; Mavropoulos A; Kiliaridis S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Jul; 73(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 25330162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology.
    Cha BK; Lee JY; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Yoshida N
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 17513876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Registration of serial maxillary models via the weighted rugae superimposition method.
    Abdi AH; Nouri M
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 May; 20(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 28150411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Predicting of growth tendency with cephalometry. Cephalometric research comparing orthodontic treatment cases with four premolar extraction].
    Szabó GT; Herényi G; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2007 Feb; 100(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17444131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth.
    Tanaka EM; Sato S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):602.e1-11; discussion 602-3. PubMed ID: 18984389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cephalometric superimposition on the occipital condyles as a longitudinal growth assessment reference: I-point and I-curve.
    Standerwick R; Roberts E; Hartsfield J; Babler W; Kanomi R
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2008 Dec; 291(12):1603-10. PubMed ID: 18833570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Natural reference structures in the human maxilla: a systematic search in children with tantalum implants.
    Springate S
    J Orthod; 2015 Mar; 42(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 25808379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.