183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27190954)
1. Retention of Implant Supported Metal Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Agents: A Comparative Invitro Study.
Kapoor R; Singh K; Kaur S; Arora A
J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Apr; 10(4):ZC61-4. PubMed ID: 27190954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Various Luting Cements on the Retention of Implant-Supported Metal Crowns.
Mehta S; Kesari A; Tomar M; Sharma U; Sagar P; Nakum P; Rao K
Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e41691. PubMed ID: 37575823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Pinés-Hueso J; deLlanos-Lanchares H; del Rio Highsmith J
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns.
Farzin M; Torabi K; Ahangari AH; Derafshi R
J Dent (Tehran); 2014 May; 11(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 25628660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prostheses: a preliminary in vitro study.
Garg P; Gupta G; Prithviraj DR; Pujari M
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(1):82-4. PubMed ID: 23342339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An
Ahsan A; Khushboo B; Kumar A; Kumari S; Poojary B; Dixit A; Kumar A; Badiyani BK
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(Suppl 1):S541-S544. PubMed ID: 36110724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An
Sarfaraz H; Hassan A; Shenoy KK; Shetty M
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):166-172. PubMed ID: 31040551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retentiveness of implant-supported metal copings using different luting agents.
Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Ebrahimi M; Savabi G
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Jan; 9(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 22363357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retention of luting agents used for implant-supported restorations: A comparative
Aladag A; Sahan MH; Akkus NO; Aktas R
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 23(8):1073-1078. PubMed ID: 32788484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The selection criteria of temporary or permanent luting agents in implant-supported prostheses: in vitro study.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Brizuela-Velasco A; Ellacuria-Echebarria J
J Adv Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 8(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 27141259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of abutment diameter, luting agent type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments.
Safari S; Hosseini Ghavam F; Amini P; Yaghmaei K
J Adv Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 10(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 29503708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
