These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27190954)

  • 21. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of air abrasion of metal implant abutments on the tensile bond strength of three luting agents used to cement implant superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Jugdev J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Lynch E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):784-90. PubMed ID: 25032757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant-supported metal copings: An in vitro study.
    Ebadian B; Jowkar M; Davoudi A; Fathi A; Ziaei M; Berg E
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Aug; 8(4):1002-1007. PubMed ID: 35618682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
    Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro comparisons of casting retention on implant abutments among commercially available and experimental castor oil-containing dental luting agents.
    Pinelli LA; Fais LM; Ricci WA; Reis JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):319-24. PubMed ID: 23684282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of Luting Materials on the Retention of Cemented Implant-Supported Crowns: An In Vitro Study.
    Naumova EA; Roth F; Geis B; Baulig C; Arnold WH; Piwowarczyk A
    Materials (Basel); 2018 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 30274184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retention Strength after Compressive Cyclic Loading of Five Luting Agents Used in Implant-Supported Prostheses.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Brizuela-Velasco A; Pinés-Hueso J; Ellakuria-Echebarria J
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():2107027. PubMed ID: 27822468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
    Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What is the Best Available Luting Agent for Implant Prosthesis?
    Almehmadi N; Kutkut A; Al-Sabbagh M
    Dent Clin North Am; 2019 Jul; 63(3):531-545. PubMed ID: 31097143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Bogacki MT; Tietge JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):737-41. PubMed ID: 1432793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retentive strength of metal copings on prefabricated abutments with five different cements.
    Maeyama H; Sawase T; Jimbo R; Kamada K; Suketa N; Fukui J; Atsuta M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 16336914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration.
    Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 16955610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations.
    Yim NH; Rueggeberg FA; Caughman WF; Gardner FM; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 10756297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interim luting agents, composite core surface hardness and retention of interim and final restorations.
    Gregory WA; Campbell Z
    Am J Dent; 1990 Oct; 3(5):207-12. PubMed ID: 2076249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.