These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27191871)

  • 1. Evaluation of the hearing protector in a real work situation using the field-microphone-in-real-ear method.
    Rocha CH; Longo IA; Moreira RR; Samelli AG
    Codas; 2016 Apr; 28(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 27191871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The role of information and training for workers on the correct use of earplugs in assessing real noise attenuation with E-A-RfitTM system].
    Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Germano C; Dentamaro A; Di Lorenzo L
    Med Lav; 2015 Jul; 106(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 26154471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Earmuff efficacy in the workplace using F-MIRE - a case report.
    Gomes RF; Samelli AG; Bistafa SR
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2018 Dec; 24(4):577-581. PubMed ID: 28776454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Measurement of real personal noise attenuation using earplugs with the E-A-Rfit system].
    Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Scarselletta RS; Di Lorenzo L
    Med Lav; 2013; 104(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 23879065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Training on hearing protector insertion improves noise attenuation.
    Samelli AG; Rocha CH; Theodósio P; Moreira RR; Neves-Lobo IF
    Codas; 2015; 27(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 26691614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise attenuation of earplugs as measured by hREAT and F-MIRE methods in a Japanese metal manufacturing plant.
    Kabe I; Kochi T; Tsuruoka H; Tonegawa T; Denda I; Nonogi M; Tsuiki H; Mizoue T; Tanaka S
    J Occup Health; 2012; 54(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 22673642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual fit testing of hearing protection devices.
    Voix J; Hager LD
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 19534854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Measurement and evaluation of personal attenuation rating before and after the training of the noise-exposed workers wearing foam earplugs].
    Liu J; Wang X; Zhang R; Bao YH; Gu KF; Pan LP
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2024 Aug; 42(8):589-593. PubMed ID: 39223044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of noise reduction of earplugs between fit test and coal mine work and observed variability of real-time noise reduction in coal mine work.
    Wu M; Guffey SE; Takacs BC
    Work; 2016 Nov; 55(3):531-538. PubMed ID: 27814321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing Protector Attenuation and Noise Exposure Among Metal Manufacturing Workers.
    Sayler SK; Rabinowitz PM; Galusha D; Sun K; Neitzel RL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):680-689. PubMed ID: 30157082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noise dosimetry for tactical environments.
    Smalt CJ; Lacirignola J; Davis SK; Calamia PT; Collins PP
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():42-54. PubMed ID: 27876480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An educated guess on the workplace attenuation variability of ear muffs.
    Lenzuni P
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 19534853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition in noise under hearing protection: A computational study of the combined effects of hearing loss and hearing protector attenuation.
    Giguère C; Berger EH
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 1():S30-40. PubMed ID: 26840922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States.
    Daniell WE; Swan SS; McDaniel MM; Camp JE; Cohen MA; Stebbins JG
    Occup Environ Med; 2006 May; 63(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16551755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.
    Neitzel R; Seixas N
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15788384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Usability of a daily noise exposure monitoring device for industrial workers.
    Williams SC; Rabinowitz PM
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Oct; 56(8):925-33. PubMed ID: 22459319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.