130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27191880)
1. Auditory-perceptual evaluation of rough and breathy voices: correspondence between analogical visual and numerical scale.
Baravieira PB; Brasolotto AG; Montagnoli AN; Silvério KC; Yamasaki R; Behlau M
Codas; 2016 Apr; 28(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 27191880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of the phonatory deviation diagram in the evaluation of rough and breathy synthesized voices.
Lopes LW; Freitas JA; Almeida AA; Silva POC; Alves GÂDS
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2018; 84(4):460-472. PubMed ID: 28732642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Normal and Dysphonic Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale.
Yamasaki R; Madazio G; Leão SHS; Padovani M; Azevedo R; Behlau M
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 26873420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory-perceptual evaluation of the degree of vocal deviation: correlation between the Visual Analogue Scale and Numerical Scale.
Martins PC; Couto TE; Gama AC
Codas; 2015; 27(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 26222946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The cut-off analysis using visual analogue scale and cepstral assessments on severity of voice disorder.
Lee YW; Kim GH; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Dec; 43(4):175-180. PubMed ID: 29671679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times.
Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; Cordeiro GF; Tsuji D; Ogawa AI; Ubrig MT; Menezes MH
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):812.e17-22. PubMed ID: 23026732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).
de Almeida SC; Mendes AP; Kempster GB
J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):582.e5-582.e13. PubMed ID: 29936062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory-perceptual Assessment of Healthy and Disordered Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale.
Contreras-Ruston F; Guzman M; Castillo-Allendes A; Cantor-Cutiva L; Behlau M
J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):654-659. PubMed ID: 34903393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Severity of voice disorders: integration of perceptual and acoustic data in dysphonic patients.
Lopes LW; Cavalcante DP; Costa PO
Codas; 2014; 26(5):382-8. PubMed ID: 25388071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory Perception of Roughness and Breathiness by Dysphonic Women.
Paz KEDS; de Almeida AAF; Almeida LNA; Sousa ESDS; Lopes LW
J Voice; 2022 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 35082050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure of dysphonia.
Heman-Ackah YD; Sataloff RT; Laureyns G; Lurie D; Michael DD; Heuer R; Rubin A; Eller R; Chandran S; Abaza M; Lyons K; Divi V; Lott J; Johnson J; Hillenbrand J
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 25179777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the Effect of Voice Quality Covariance on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation Using a Novel Two-Dimensional Magnitude Estimation Task.
Anand S; Park Y; Shrivastav R; Eddins DA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Dec; 66(12):4849-4859. PubMed ID: 37902504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
Lu FL; Matteson S
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory Training With Synthesized Voice Anchors: Effects on Rater Agreement.
Gama ACC; da Mata SM; Martins Dos Santos PC; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Quinino RDC
J Voice; 2024 Mar; 38(2):366-375. PubMed ID: 34702611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of listener experience, measurement scale and speech task on the reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.
Alves JDN; Almeida AAF; Yamasaki R; Lopes LW
Codas; 2024; 36(3):e20230175. PubMed ID: 38629682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and the Acoustic Breathiness Index in the Spanish language.
Delgado Hernández J; León Gómez NM; Jiménez A; Izquierdo LM; Barsties V Latoszek B
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 May; 127(5):317-326. PubMed ID: 29490478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interactions Between Breathy and Rough Voice Qualities and Their Contributions to Overall Dysphonia Severity.
Park Y; Anand S; Kopf LM; Shrivastav R; Eddins DA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Nov; 65(11):4071-4084. PubMed ID: 36260821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual Voice Dimensions' Prediction of Overall Dysphonia Severity on Two Auditory-Perceptual Scales.
Walden PR; Rau S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 65(8):2759-2777. PubMed ID: 35868295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Zraick RI; Kempster GB; Connor NP; Thibeault S; Klaben BK; Bursac Z; Thrush CR; Glaze LE
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Feb; 20(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 20739631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
