These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27192511)
1. Evaluation of dental material series from patients with dental prostheses and suspicion of delayed hypersensitivity. Yoshimura FC; Cunha Vdo E; Hahnstadt RL; Pires MC An Bras Dermatol; 2016 Apr; 91(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 27192511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contact dermatitis and adverse oral mucous membrane reactions related to the use of dental prostheses. Vilaplana J; Romaguera C; Cornellana F Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Feb; 30(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 8187507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cobalt release and complications resulting from the use of dental prostheses. Al-Imam H; Benetti AR; Özhayat EB; Pedersen AM; Johansen JD; Thyssen JP; Jellesen MS; Gotfredsen K Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Dec; 75(6):377-383. PubMed ID: 27385620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Dental materials--problem substances in allergologic diagnosis? I: Analysis of test results in patients with mouth mucosa/dental material problems]. Richter G; Geier J Hautarzt; 1996 Nov; 47(11):839-43. PubMed ID: 9036137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Positive patch test reactions to allergens of the dental series and the relation to the clinical presentations. Khamaysi Z; Bergman R; Weltfriend S Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Oct; 55(4):216-8. PubMed ID: 16958919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patch test standard series recommended by the Brazilian Contact Dermatitis Study Group during the 2006-2011 period. Duarte IA; Tanaka GM; Suzuki NM; Lazzarini R; Lopes AS; Volpini BM; Castro PC An Bras Dermatol; 2013; 88(6):1015-8. PubMed ID: 24474122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patch test results in children and adolescents. Study from the Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte Dermatology Clinic, Brazil, from 2003 to 2010. Rodrigues DF; Goulart EM An Bras Dermatol; 2015; 90(5):671-83. PubMed ID: 26560213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fragrance series testing in eyelid dermatitis. Wenk KS; Ehrlich A Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 22653065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contact allergy to (meth)acrylates in the dental series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens. Goon AT; Isaksson M; Zimerson E; Goh CL; Bruze M Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Oct; 55(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 16958920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contact dermatitis and adverse oral mucous membrane reactions related to the use of dental prostheses. Vilaplana J; Romaguera C Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Sep; 43(3):183-5. PubMed ID: 10985646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG). Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J; Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis. Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vesicular Contact Reaction May Progress into Erythema Multiforme. Czarnecka-Operacz M; Jenerowicz D; Szulczyńska-Gabor J; Teresiak-Mikołajczak E; Szyfter-Harris J; Bowszyc-Dmochowska M Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2016 Dec; 24(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 28128086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Standard 65-allergen series alone in the evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis: a series of 794 patients. Cohen DE; Rao S; Brancaccio RR Dermatitis; 2008; 19(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 18627685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by exposure to acrylates during work with dental prostheses. Kanerva L; Estlander T; Jolanki R; Tarvainen K Contact Dermatitis; 1993 May; 28(5):268-75. PubMed ID: 8365125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007. Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period. Pratt MD; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug K Dermatitis; 2004 Dec; 15(4):176-83. PubMed ID: 15842061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of patch-tests from Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte Dermatology Clinic, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, from 2003 to 2010. Rodrigues DF; Neves DR; Pinto JM; Alves MF; Fulgêncio AC An Bras Dermatol; 2012; 87(5):800-3. PubMed ID: 23044584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Expression of contact allergy in undergoing prosthodontic therapy patients with oral diseases. Mehulić M; Mehulić K; Kos P; Komar D; Katunarić M Minerva Stomatol; 2005 May; 54(5):303-9. PubMed ID: 15985984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of dental restoration materials in oral mucosal lichenoid lesions. Sharma R; Handa S; De D; Radotra BD; Rattan V Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2015; 81(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 26261149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]