These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
591 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27192636)
1. Empowerment of Parents of Children With Craniosynostosis by Objective Scoring of Patient Information Websites. Lloyd MS; Lafferty K; Horton J; Noons P; Dover S; Evans M J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 27(4):874-5. PubMed ID: 27192636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Empowerment of Parents of Children With Cleft Lip and Palate by Objective Scoring of Patient Information Websites. Rangaraju M; Lloyd MS; Khan K J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 32(6):2050-2052. PubMed ID: 33770038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The design and content of orthodontic practise websites in the UK is suboptimal and does not correlate with search ranking. Patel A; Cobourne MT Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 25488944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia. Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus. Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the quality and readability of online information about breast cancer in China. Li Y; Zhou X; Zhou Y; Mao F; Shen S; Lin Y; Zhang X; Chang TH; Sun Q Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Apr; 104(4):858-864. PubMed ID: 32988687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of information on the Internet for Korean patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Yoon JS; Lee SJ; Kim ES; Kim SK; Jung MK; Lee HS; Kwon YH; Nam SY; Jeon SW; Jin S; Lee JS; Yeo SJ Korean J Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 34(6):1215-1222. PubMed ID: 30257552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A review of mesothelioma information on the World Wide Web. Tan BH; Kostopanagiotou K; Jilaihawi AN J Thorac Oncol; 2009 Jan; 4(1):102-4. PubMed ID: 19096315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Generic medicines: an evaluation of the accuracy and accessibility of information available on the Internet. Dunne SS; Cummins NM; Hannigan A; Shannon B; Dunne C; Cullen W BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2013 Oct; 13():115. PubMed ID: 24099099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Side effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients : The Internet as an information source. Janssen S; Käsmann L; Fahlbusch FB; Rades D; Vordermark D Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Feb; 194(2):136-142. PubMed ID: 28856383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glue ear: how good is the information on the World Wide Web? Ritchie L; Tornari C; Patel PM; Lakhani R J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Feb; 130(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 26805389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biologic agents in inflammatory bowel disease - quality of internet website information. Rofaiel R; Chande N Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2018; 24(6):336-341. PubMed ID: 30004043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review. Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of Information Available Via the Internet for Patients With Otological Conditions. Danino J; Muzaffar J; Mitchell-Innes A; Howard J; Coulson C Otol Neurotol; 2016 Sep; 37(8):1063-5. PubMed ID: 27525619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is the Internet a Suitable Patient Resource for Information on Common Radiological Investigations?: Radiology-Related Information on the Internet. Bowden DJ; Yap LC; Sheppard DG Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):826-830. PubMed ID: 28216191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microtia and Social Media: Patient Versus Physician Perspective of Quality of Information. Sepehripour S; McDermott AL; Lloyd MS J Craniofac Surg; 2017 May; 28(3):643-645. PubMed ID: 28468140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy. Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality Evaluation of Consumer Health Information Websites Found on Google Using DISCERN, CRAAP, and HONcode. Portillo IA; Johnson CV; Johnson SY Med Ref Serv Q; 2021; 40(4):396-407. PubMed ID: 34752199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the quality of information available on the internet on vaginal meshes. Furtado Meinberg M; Cardoso Brandão W; Andrade Werneck R; Zarnowski Passos M; da Silva-Filho AL Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Sep; 264():330-335. PubMed ID: 34365137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variable Quality and Readability of Patient-oriented Websites on Colorectal Cancer Screening. Schreuders EH; Grobbee EJ; Kuipers EJ; Spaander MC; Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):79-85.e3. PubMed ID: 27404964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]