These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27193158)

  • 1. ASL-LEX: A lexical database of American Sign Language.
    Caselli NK; Sehyr ZS; Cohen-Goldberg AM; Emmorey K
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Apr; 49(2):784-801. PubMed ID: 27193158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ASL-LEX 2.0 Project: A Database of Lexical and Phonological Properties for 2,723 Signs in American Sign Language.
    Sehyr ZS; Caselli N; Cohen-Goldberg AM; Emmorey K
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2021 Mar; 26(2):263-277. PubMed ID: 33598676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of multiple linguistic variables on picture naming in American Sign Language.
    Sehyr ZS; Emmorey K
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2502-2521. PubMed ID: 34918219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When does Iconicity in Sign Language Matter?
    Baus C; Carreiras M; Emmorey K
    Lang Cogn Process; 2013 Mar; 28(3):261-271. PubMed ID: 23543899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-modal translation priming and iconicity effects in deaf signers and hearing learners of American Sign Language.
    Mott M; Midgley KJ; Holcomb PJ; Emmorey K
    Biling (Camb Engl); 2020 Nov; 23(5):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 33897272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective frequency ratings for 432 ASL signs.
    Mayberry RI; Hall ML; Zvaigzne M
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Jun; 46(2):526-39. PubMed ID: 23943581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psycholinguistic norms for more than 300 lexical signs in German Sign Language (DGS).
    Trettenbrein PC; Pendzich NK; Cramer JM; Steinbach M; Zaccarella E
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Oct; 53(5):1817-1832. PubMed ID: 33575986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. American Sign Language Comprehension Test: A Tool for Sign Language Researchers.
    Hauser PC; Paludneviciene R; Riddle W; Kurz KB; Emmorey K; Contreras J
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2016 Jan; 21(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 26590608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Language development in deaf bilinguals: Deaf middle school students co-activate written English and American Sign Language during lexical processing.
    Villwock A; Wilkinson E; Piñar P; Morford JP
    Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104642. PubMed ID: 33752155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How (and why) does iconicity effect lexical access: An electrophysiological study of American sign language.
    McGarry ME; Midgley KJ; Holcomb PJ; Emmorey K
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 May; 183():108516. PubMed ID: 36796720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Looking through phonological shape to lexical meaning: the bottleneck of non-native sign language processing.
    Mayberry RI; Fischer SD
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Nov; 17(6):740-54. PubMed ID: 2811671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of iconicity and semantic relatedness on lexical access in american sign language.
    Bosworth RG; Emmorey K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1573-81. PubMed ID: 20919784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bilingual word recognition in deaf and hearing signers: Effects of proficiency and language dominance on cross-language activation.
    Morford JP; Kroll JF; Piñar P; Wilkinson E
    Second Lang Res; 2014 Apr; 30(2):251-271. PubMed ID: 32982006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The perceived mapping between form and meaning in American Sign Language depends on linguistic knowledge and task: evidence from iconicity and transparency judgments.
    Sehyr ZS; Emmorey K
    Lang Cogn; 2019 Jun; 11(2):208-234. PubMed ID: 31798755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Language specificity in lexical organization: evidence from deaf signers' lexical organization of American Sign Language and English.
    Hanson VL; Feldman LB
    Mem Cognit; 1989 May; 17(3):292-301. PubMed ID: 2725266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Road to Language Learning Is Not Entirely Iconic: Iconicity, Neighborhood Density, and Frequency Facilitate Acquisition of Sign Language.
    Caselli NK; Pyers JE
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Jul; 28(7):979-987. PubMed ID: 28557672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ASL Phonological Fluency: How Do Deaf Signers Retrieve and Produce Signs?
    Beal JS; Bowman S
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2023 Mar; 28(2):178-188. PubMed ID: 36526438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spoken Language Activation Alters Subsequent Sign Language Activation in L2 Learners of American Sign Language.
    Williams JT; Newman SD
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Feb; 46(1):211-225. PubMed ID: 27112154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Matching pictures and signs: An ERP study of the effects of iconic structural alignment in American sign language.
    McGarry ME; Massa N; Mott M; Midgley KJ; Holcomb PJ; Emmorey K
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Nov; 162():108051. PubMed ID: 34624260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When deaf signers read English: do written words activate their sign translations?
    Morford JP; Wilkinson E; Villwock A; Piñar P; Kroll JF
    Cognition; 2011 Feb; 118(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 21145047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.