These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27193241)

  • 1. Exclusion performance and learning by exclusion in dogs.
    Zaine I; Domeniconi C; de Rose JC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):362-74. PubMed ID: 27193241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responding by exclusion in Wistar rats in a simultaneous visual discrimination task.
    Felipe de Souza M; Schmidt A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Nov; 102(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 25220019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inferential reasoning by exclusion in pigeons, dogs, and humans.
    Aust U; Range F; Steurer M; Huber L
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Oct; 11(4):587-97. PubMed ID: 18309524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Formation of new stimulus equivalence classes by exclusion.
    Plazas EA; Villamil CW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Mar; 109(2):380-393. PubMed ID: 29509271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responding by exclusion in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Cippola NS; Domeniconi C; Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 24436090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tests for control by exclusion and negative stimulus relations of arbitrary matching to sample in a "symmetry-emergent" chimpanzee.
    Tomonaga M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jan; 59(1):215-29. PubMed ID: 8433065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relational concept learning in domestic dogs: Performance on a two-choice size discrimination task generalises to novel stimuli.
    Byosiere SE; Feng LC; Chouinard PA; Howell TJ; Bennett PC
    Behav Processes; 2017 Dec; 145():93-101. PubMed ID: 29056526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hierarchical stimulus processing by dogs (Canis familiaris).
    Pitteri E; Mongillo P; Carnier P; Marinelli L
    Anim Cogn; 2014 Jul; 17(4):869-77. PubMed ID: 24337824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emergent conditional discriminations in children and adults: stimulus equivalence derived from simple discriminations.
    Smeets PM; Barnes D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Jul; 66(1):64-84. PubMed ID: 9226934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Observational learning of two visual discriminations by pigeons: a within-subjects design.
    Biederman GB; Robertson HA; Vanayan M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jul; 46(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 3746187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancement of equivalence class formation by pretraining discriminative functions.
    Nartey RK; Arntzen E; Fields L
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 25425295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of exemplar training in exclusion responding on auditory-visual discrimination tasks with children with autism.
    Carr D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(4):507-24. PubMed ID: 14768669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aging effects on discrimination learning, logical reasoning and memory in pet dogs.
    Wallis LJ; Virányi Z; Müller CA; Serisier S; Huber L; Range F
    Age (Dordr); 2016 Feb; 38(1):6. PubMed ID: 26728398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resurgence of derived stimulus relations.
    Wilson KG; Hayes SC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Nov; 66(3):267-81. PubMed ID: 8921611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two methods for teaching simple visual discriminations to learners with severe disabilities.
    Graff RB; Green G
    Res Dev Disabil; 2004; 25(3):295-307. PubMed ID: 15134794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pavlovian conditioning enhances resistance to disruption of dogs performing an odor discrimination.
    Hall NJ; Smith DW; Wynne CD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 May; 103(3):484-97. PubMed ID: 25912271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Stimulus generalization" between differentiated visual, auditory, and central stimuli.
    John ER; Kleinman D
    J Neurophysiol; 1975 Jul; 38(4):1015-34. PubMed ID: 1159461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emergent, untrained stimulus relations in many-to-one matching-to-sample discriminations in rats.
    Nakagawa E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Mar; 83(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 15828594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chimpanzee responding during matching to sample: control by exclusion.
    Beran MJ; Washburn DA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):497-508. PubMed ID: 12507016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emergent simple discrimination in children: preference for non-preferred stimuli.
    Smeets PM
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1993 Nov; 46(4):321-43. PubMed ID: 8272524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.