These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27193918)
1. Quantifying the impact of different approaches for handling continuous predictors on the performance of a prognostic model. Collins GS; Ogundimu EO; Cook JA; Manach YL; Altman DG Stat Med; 2016 Oct; 35(23):4124-35. PubMed ID: 27193918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Poor handling of continuous predictors in clinical prediction models using logistic regression: a systematic review. Ma J; Dhiman P; Qi C; Bullock G; van Smeden M; Riley RD; Collins GS J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Sep; 161():140-151. PubMed ID: 37536504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic models for identifying risk of poor outcome in people with acute ankle sprains: the SPRAINED development and external validation study. Keene DJ; Schlüssel MM; Thompson J; Hagan DA; Williams MA; Byrne C; Goodacre S; Cooke M; Gwilym S; Hormbrey P; Bostock J; Haywood K; Wilson D; Collins GS; Lamb SE Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(64):1-112. PubMed ID: 30474592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Building multivariable regression models with continuous covariates in clinical epidemiology--with an emphasis on fractional polynomials. Royston P; Sauerbrei W Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(4):561-71. PubMed ID: 16342923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An approach to estimating prognosis using fractional polynomials in metastatic renal carcinoma. Royston P; Reitz M; Atzpodien J Br J Cancer; 2006 Jun; 94(12):1785-8. PubMed ID: 16736003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of statistical methods used in prognostic prediction models for obstetric care: A 10 year-span cross-sectional study. Tan J; Liu C; Yang M; Xiong Y; Huang S; Qi Y; Chen M; Thabane L; Liu X; He L; Sun X Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Mar; 103(3):611-620. PubMed ID: 38140844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of methods to adjust for continuous covariates in the analysis of randomised trials. Kahan BC; Rushton H; Morris TP; Daniel RM BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():42. PubMed ID: 27068456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation and development of models using clinical, biochemical and ultrasound markers for predicting pre-eclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Allotey J; Snell KI; Smuk M; Hooper R; Chan CL; Ahmed A; Chappell LC; von Dadelszen P; Dodds J; Green M; Kenny L; Khalil A; Khan KS; Mol BW; Myers J; Poston L; Thilaganathan B; Staff AC; Smith GC; Ganzevoort W; Laivuori H; Odibo AO; Ramírez JA; Kingdom J; Daskalakis G; Farrar D; Baschat AA; Seed PT; Prefumo F; da Silva Costa F; Groen H; Audibert F; Masse J; Skråstad RB; Salvesen KÅ; Haavaldsen C; Nagata C; Rumbold AR; Heinonen S; Askie LM; Smits LJ; Vinter CA; Magnus PM; Eero K; Villa PM; Jenum AK; Andersen LB; Norman JE; Ohkuchi A; Eskild A; Bhattacharya S; McAuliffe FM; Galindo A; Herraiz I; Carbillon L; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Yeo S; Teede HJ; Browne JL; Moons KG; Riley RD; Thangaratinam S Health Technol Assess; 2020 Dec; 24(72):1-252. PubMed ID: 33336645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-linear transformations of age at diagnosis, tumor size, and number of positive lymph nodes in prediction of clinical outcome in breast cancer. Forsare C; Bak M; Falck AK; Grabau D; Killander F; Malmström P; Rydén L; Stål O; Sundqvist M; Bendahl PO; Fernö M BMC Cancer; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1226. PubMed ID: 30526533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery. Vernooij LM; van Klei WA; Moons KG; Takada T; van Waes J; Damen JA Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Dec; 12(12):CD013139. PubMed ID: 34931303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fractional polynomials in a new metastatic renal carcinoma continuous prognostic index involving histology, laboratory, and clinical predictors. Atzpodien J; Royston P; Stoerkel S; Reitz M Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2007 Dec; 22(6):812-8. PubMed ID: 18158772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of half-life periods in nonlinear data with fractional polynomials. Mayer B; Keller F; Syrovets T; Wittau M Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1791-1803. PubMed ID: 23999890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A strategy for modelling the effect of a continuous covariate in medicine and epidemiology. Royston P Stat Med; 2000 Jul; 19(14):1831-47. PubMed ID: 10867674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and prospective external validation of a tool to predict poor recovery at 9 months after acute ankle sprain in UK emergency departments: the SPRAINED prognostic model. Schlussel MM; Keene DJ; Collins GS; Bostock J; Byrne C; Goodacre S; Gwilym S; Hagan DA; Haywood K; Thompson J; Williams MA; Lamb SE; BMJ Open; 2018 Nov; 8(11):e022802. PubMed ID: 30397008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the development and validation of empirically-derived prognostic models for pressure ulcer risk assessment: A systematic review. Shi C; Dumville JC; Cullum N Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Jan; 89():88-103. PubMed ID: 30352322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selection of important variables and determination of functional form for continuous predictors in multivariable model building. Sauerbrei W; Royston P; Binder H Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5512-28. PubMed ID: 18058845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Categorizing continuous variables resulted in different predictors in a prognostic model for nonspecific neck pain. Schellingerhout JM; Heymans MW; de Vet HC; Koes BW; Verhagen AP J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):868-74. PubMed ID: 19230604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)]. ; ; Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic factors and prediction models for acute aortic dissection: a systematic review. Ren Y; Huang S; Li Q; Liu C; Li L; Tan J; Zou K; Sun X BMJ Open; 2021 Feb; 11(2):e042435. PubMed ID: 33550248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]