These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27193918)

  • 21. Developing risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of methodology and reporting.
    Collins GS; Mallett S; Omar O; Yu LM
    BMC Med; 2011 Sep; 9():103. PubMed ID: 21902820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating Flexible Modeling of Continuous Covariates in Inverse-Weighted Estimators.
    Kyle RP; Moodie EEM; Klein MB; Abrahamowicz M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 188(6):1181-1191. PubMed ID: 30649165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modelling subject-specific childhood growth using linear mixed-effect models with cubic regression splines.
    Grajeda LM; Ivanescu A; Saito M; Crainiceanu C; Jaganath D; Gilman RH; Crabtree JE; Kelleher D; Cabrera L; Cama V; Checkley W
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2016; 13():1. PubMed ID: 26752996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predictive fat mass equations for spinal muscular atrophy type I children: Development and internal validation.
    Foppiani A; De Amicis R; Leone A; Ravella S; Bedogni G; Battezzati A; D'Amico A; Bertini E; Pedemonte M; Bruno C; Agosto C; Mastella C; Giaquinto E; Masson R; Baranello G; Bertoli S
    Clin Nutr; 2021 Apr; 40(4):1578-1587. PubMed ID: 33744602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Construction and validation of a prognostic model across several studies, with an application in superficial bladder cancer.
    Royston P; Parmar MK; Sylvester R
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):907-26. PubMed ID: 15027080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modeling Continuous Prognostic Factors in Survival Analysis: Implications for Tumor Staging and Assessing Chemotherapy Effect in Osteosarcoma.
    Cates JMM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Apr; 42(4):485-491. PubMed ID: 29200101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A prognostic model to guide decision-making on timing of delivery in late preterm pre-eclampsia: the PEACOCK prospective cohort study.
    Duhig K; Seed PT; Placzek A; Sparkes J; Gill C; Brockbank A; Shennan A; Thangaratinam S; Chappell LC
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 May; 25(30):1-32. PubMed ID: 34024312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modeling continuous covariates with a "spike" at zero: Bivariate approaches.
    Jenkner C; Lorenz E; Becher H; Sauerbrei W
    Biom J; 2016 Jul; 58(4):783-96. PubMed ID: 27072783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prognostic biomarkers to identify patients likely to develop severe Crohn's disease: a systematic review.
    Halligan S; Boone D; Archer L; Ahmad T; Bloom S; Rodriguez-Justo M; Taylor SA; Mallett S
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jul; 25(45):1-66. PubMed ID: 34225839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predictive models for musculoskeletal injury risk: why statistical approach makes all the difference.
    Rhon DI; Teyhen DS; Collins GS; Bullock GS
    BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med; 2022; 8(4):e001388. PubMed ID: 36268503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prognostic Models for Global Functional Outcome and Post-Concussion Symptoms Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study.
    Mikolić A; Steyerberg EW; Polinder S; Wilson L; Zeldovich M; von Steinbuechel N; Newcombe VFJ; Menon DK; van der Naalt J; Lingsma HF; Maas AIR; van Klaveren D
    J Neurotrauma; 2023 Aug; 40(15-16):1651-1670. PubMed ID: 37078144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new approach to categorising continuous variables in prediction models: Proposal and validation.
    Barrio I; Arostegui I; Rodríguez-Álvarez MX; Quintana JM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2586-2602. PubMed ID: 26384514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
    Williams C; Brunskill S; Altman D; Briggs A; Campbell H; Clarke M; Glanville J; Gray A; Harris A; Johnston K; Lodge M
    Health Technol Assess; 2006 Sep; 10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. PubMed ID: 16959170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance of critical care prognostic scoring systems in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
    Haniffa R; Isaam I; De Silva AP; Dondorp AM; De Keizer NF
    Crit Care; 2018 Jan; 22(1):18. PubMed ID: 29373996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using fractional polynomials and restricted cubic splines to model non-proportional hazards or time-varying covariate effects in the Cox regression model.
    Austin PC; Fang J; Lee DS
    Stat Med; 2022 Feb; 41(3):612-624. PubMed ID: 34806210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patients With Femoral Neck Fractures Are at Risk for Conversion to Arthroplasty After Internal Fixation: A Machine-learning Algorithm.
    van de Kuit A; Oosterhoff JHF; Dijkstra H; Sprague S; Bzovsky S; Bhandari M; Swiontkowski M; Schemitsch EH; IJpma FFA; Poolman RW; Doornberg JN; Hendrickx LAM;
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Dec; 480(12):2350-2360. PubMed ID: 35767811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stability of multivariable fractional polynomial models with selection of variables and transformations: a bootstrap investigation.
    Royston P; Sauerbrei W
    Stat Med; 2003 Feb; 22(4):639-59. PubMed ID: 12590419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Patient subgroup identification for clinical drug development.
    Huang X; Sun Y; Trow P; Chatterjee S; Chakravartty A; Tian L; Devanarayan V
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(9):1414-1428. PubMed ID: 28147447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison between splines and fractional polynomials for multivariable model building with continuous covariates: a simulation study with continuous response.
    Binder H; Sauerbrei W; Royston P
    Stat Med; 2013 Jun; 32(13):2262-77. PubMed ID: 23034770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new approach to modelling interactions between treatment and continuous covariates in clinical trials by using fractional polynomials.
    Royston P; Sauerbrei W
    Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(16):2509-25. PubMed ID: 15287081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.