152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27193946)
1. Power considerations for λ inflation factor in meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies.
Georgiopoulos G; Evangelou E
Genet Res (Camb); 2016 May; 98():e9. PubMed ID: 27193946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A critical evaluation of genomic control methods for genetic association studies.
Dadd T; Weale ME; Lewis CM
Genet Epidemiol; 2009 May; 33(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 19051284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Defining the power limits of genome-wide association scan meta-analyses.
Chapman K; Ferreira T; Morris A; Asimit J; Zeggini E
Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(8):781-9. PubMed ID: 21922540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Framework for Interpreting Type I Error Rates from a Product-Term Model of Interaction Applied to Quantitative Traits.
Rao TJ; Province MA
Genet Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 26659945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and application of genomic control methods for genome-wide association studies using non-additive models.
Tsepilov YA; Ried JS; Strauch K; Grallert H; van Duijn CM; Axenovich TI; Aulchenko YS
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81431. PubMed ID: 24358113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimated allele substitution effects underlying genomic evaluation models depend on the scaling of allele counts.
Bouwman AC; Hayes BJ; Calus MPL
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Oct; 49(1):79. PubMed ID: 29084514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of imputation on meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies.
Li J; Guo YF; Pei Y; Deng HW
PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e34486. PubMed ID: 22496814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A benchmark study on current GWAS models in admixed populations.
Yang Z; Cieza B; Reyes-Dumeyer D; Montesinos R; Soto-Añari M; Custodio N; Tosto G
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Nov; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 38037235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How powerful are summary-based methods for identifying expression-trait associations under different genetic architectures?
Veturi Y; Ritchie MD
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2018; 23():228-239. PubMed ID: 29218884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A mixed model reduces spurious genetic associations produced by population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
Shin J; Lee C
Genomics; 2015 Apr; 105(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 25640449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel random effect model for GWAS meta-analysis and its application to trans-ethnic meta-analysis.
Shi J; Lee S
Biometrics; 2016 Sep; 72(3):945-54. PubMed ID: 26916671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regionally Smoothed Meta-Analysis Methods for GWAS Datasets.
Begum F; Sharker MH; Sherman SL; Tseng GC; Feingold E
Genet Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 26707090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A robust method for genome-wide association meta-analysis with the application to circulating insulin-like growth factor I concentrations.
Wang T; Zhou B; Guo T; Bidlingmaier M; Wallaschofski H; Teumer A; Vasan RS; Kaplan RC
Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 38(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 24446417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Control for population stratification in genetic association studies based on GWAS summary statistics.
Yan S; Sha Q; Zhang S
Genet Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 46(8):604-614. PubMed ID: 35766057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Weighting genomic and genealogical information for genetic parameter estimation and breeding value prediction in tropical beef cattle.
Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Li Y; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
J Anim Sci; 2018 Mar; 96(2):612-617. PubMed ID: 29385460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a Two-Stage Approach in Trans-Ethnic Meta-Analysis in Genome-Wide Association Studies.
Hong J; Lunetta KL; Cupples LA; Dupuis J; Liu CT
Genet Epidemiol; 2016 May; 40(4):284-92. PubMed ID: 27061095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genotype Imputation from Large Reference Panels.
Das S; Abecasis GR; Browning BL
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2018 Aug; 19():73-96. PubMed ID: 29799802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Double genomic control is not effective to correct for population stratification in meta-analysis for genome-wide association studies.
Wang S; Chen W; Chen X; Hu F; Archer KJ; Liu HN; Sun S; Gao G
Front Genet; 2012; 3():300. PubMed ID: 23269928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Local ancestry corrects for population structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome-wide association studies.
Diao L; Chen KC
Genetics; 2012 Dec; 192(4):1503-11. PubMed ID: 23023004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
