These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27194694)

  • 1. Collateral damage or a shadow of safety? The effects of signalling heterospecific neighbours on the risks of parasitism and predation.
    Trillo PA; Bernal XE; Caldwell MS; Halfwerk WH; Wessel MO; Page RA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 May; 283(1831):. PubMed ID: 27194694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cues for eavesdroppers: do frog calls indicate prey density and quality?
    Bernal XE; Page RA; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Am Nat; 2007 Mar; 169(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 17230403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multimodal cues improve prey localization under complex environmental conditions.
    Rhebergen F; Taylor RC; Ryan MJ; Page RA; Halfwerk W
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Sep; 282(1814):. PubMed ID: 26336176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Signal perception in frogs and bats and the evolution of mating signals.
    Akre KL; Farris HE; Lea AM; Page RA; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6043):751-2. PubMed ID: 21817052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risks of multimodal signaling: bat predators attend to dynamic motion in frog sexual displays.
    Halfwerk W; Dixon MM; Ottens KJ; Taylor RC; Ryan MJ; Page RA; Jones PL
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Sep; 217(Pt 17):3038-44. PubMed ID: 25165134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cues used in host-seeking behavior by frog-biting midges (Corethrella spp. Coquillet).
    Bernal XE; de Silva P
    J Vector Ecol; 2015 Jun; 40(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 26047192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prey Exploits the Auditory Illusions of Eavesdropping Predators.
    Legett HD; Hemingway CT; Bernal XE
    Am Nat; 2020 May; 195(5):927-933. PubMed ID: 32364791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling Sexual Selection in Túngara Frog and Rationality of Mate Choice.
    Vargas Bernal E; Sanabria Malagon C
    Bull Math Biol; 2017 Dec; 79(12):2847-2864. PubMed ID: 28983864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Synchronized mating signals in a communication network: the challenge of avoiding predators while attracting mates.
    Legett HD; Page RA; Bernal XE
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Oct; 286(1912):20191067. PubMed ID: 31594513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hematophagous Flies Attracted to Frog Calls in a Preserved Seasonal Forest of the Austral Neotropics, with a Description of a New Species of Corethrella (Diptera: Corethrellidae).
    Caldart VM; Santos MB; Iop S; Pinho LC; Cechin SZ
    Zoolog Sci; 2016 Oct; 33(5):527-536. PubMed ID: 27715416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The dual benefits of synchronized mating signals in a Japanese treefrog: attracting mates and manipulating predators.
    Legett HD; Aihara I; Bernal XE
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Oct; 376(1835):20200340. PubMed ID: 34420389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of geographic heterogeneity in predation pressure on sexual signal divergence in an Amazonian frog species complex.
    Trillo PA; Athanas KA; Goldhill DH; Hoke KL; Funk WC
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 23181745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexibility in assessment of prey cues: frog-eating bats and frog calls.
    Page RA; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Apr; 272(1565):841-7. PubMed ID: 15888417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bats without borders: Predators learn novel prey cues from other predatory species.
    Patriquin KJ; Kohles JE; Page RA; Ratcliffe JM
    Sci Adv; 2018 Mar; 4(3):eaaq0579. PubMed ID: 29568801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive changes in sexual signalling in response to urbanization.
    Halfwerk W; Blaas M; Kramer L; Hijner N; Trillo PA; Bernal XE; Page RA; Goutte S; Ryan MJ; Ellers J
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2019 Mar; 3(3):374-380. PubMed ID: 30532046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Arginine vasotocin promotes calling behavior and call changes in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Whitney TK; Davis ES; Marler CA
    Brain Behav Evol; 2007; 69(4):254-65. PubMed ID: 17299257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Silent katydid females are at higher risk of bat predation than acoustically signalling katydid males.
    Raghuram H; Deb R; Nandi D; Balakrishnan R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jan; 282(1798):20142319. PubMed ID: 25429019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patterns of mating call preferences in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Ryan MJ; Bernal XE; Rand AS
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 20(6):2235-47. PubMed ID: 17956386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental conditions limit attractiveness of a complex sexual signal in the túngara frog.
    Halfwerk W; Smit JAH; Loning H; Lea AM; Geipel I; Ellers J; Ryan MJ
    Nat Commun; 2017 Dec; 8(1):1891. PubMed ID: 29192162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural activity patterns in response to interspecific and intraspecific variation in mating calls in the túngara frog.
    Chakraborty M; Mangiamele LA; Burmeister SS
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):e12898. PubMed ID: 20877560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.