These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2719634)

  • 1. [A simple test phantom in the form of a staircase for running control of the image in veterinary roentgenology].
    Parisot M
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1989 Apr; 102(4):117-23. PubMed ID: 2719634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The use of a test phantom in step-shaped forms (test steps) for the clarification of different problem situations in x-ray diagnosis. 1. The use of test steps for the estimation of image quality after modified darkroom technics].
    Parisot M
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1990 Mar; 103(3):92-4. PubMed ID: 2317188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The problems of X-ray image formation in veterinary practice--result of a cyclic study with the use of a test phantom for the determination of image quality].
    Parisot M; Keck G
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1991 Jun; 104(6):187-92. PubMed ID: 1883311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new method for measurement of bone mineral deposition pattern--using dual energy radiographic densitometry method in a single exposure.
    Katoh T; Sakamaki K; Nakamura T
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1981 Sep; 28(3):91-8. PubMed ID: 6945154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Quality control in x-ray diagnosis by using a universally applicable phantom].
    Eder H
    Rofo; 1983 Nov; 139(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 6416970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of image quality obtained with optical and radiographic magnification techniques in fine-detail skeletal radiography: effect of object thickness.
    Doi K; Genant HK; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1976 Jan; 118(1):189-95. PubMed ID: 1244657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chest radiography: a survey of techniques and exposure levels currently used.
    Butler PF; Conway BJ; Suleiman OH; Koustenis GH; Showalter CK
    Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):533-6. PubMed ID: 4011920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The use of a test model in a stepped form (test steps) for the clarification of different problem situations in X-ray diagnosis. 2. The use of test steps for testing the POLAROID-TPX immediate X-ray picture system].
    Parisot M
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1990 Apr; 103(4):118-20. PubMed ID: 2331246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Practical quality assurance in x-ray diagnosis (author's transl)].
    Stender HS
    Rontgenblatter; 1980 Dec; 33(12):618-25. PubMed ID: 7455537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of film graininess and geometric unsharpness on image quality in fine-detail skeletal radiography.
    Doi K; Genant HK; Rossmann K
    Invest Radiol; 1975; 10(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 1112648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual-beam imaging for online verification of radiotherapy field placement.
    Jaffray DA; Chawla K; Yu C; Wong JW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1273-80. PubMed ID: 7493852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurements of the effects of x-ray film--screen characteristics on threshold detectability of small low-contrast objects.
    Lassen M; Bloch P
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 683155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
    Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
    Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quality control in X-ray diagnostic equipment with automatic exposure using a newly-developed test phantom. I. Tube voltage and exposure time].
    Hagemann G
    Rontgenblatter; 1980 Aug; 33(8):379-85. PubMed ID: 7403789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Small object contrast in AMBER and conventional chest radiography.
    Chotas HG; Van Metter RL; Johnson GA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1991 Sep; 180(3):853-9. PubMed ID: 1871306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A phantom for the measurement of contrast detail performance in film-screen mammography.
    Thompson SR; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Nov; 64(767):1049-55. PubMed ID: 1742587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinically acceptable tolerance of roentgen generator exposure parameters.
    Forsberg H
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 2952133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.