264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27196493)
1. A Randomized Cadaver Study Comparing First-Attempt Success Between Tibial and Humeral Intraosseous Insertions Using NIO Device by Paramedics: A Preliminary Investigation.
Szarpak L; Truszewski Z; Smereka J; Krajewski P; Fudalej M; Adamczyk P; Czyzewski L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(20):e3724. PubMed ID: 27196493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of four different intraosseous access devices during simulated pediatric resuscitation. A randomized crossover manikin trial.
Bielski K; Szarpak L; Smereka J; Ladny JR; Leung S; Ruetzler K
Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jul; 176(7):865-871. PubMed ID: 28500463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Military Medic Performance with Employment of a Commercial Intraosseous Infusion Device: A Randomized, Crossover Study.
Gendron B; Cronin A; Monti J; Brigg A
Mil Med; 2018 May; 183(5-6):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 29420766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An observational, prospective study comparing tibial and humeral intraosseous access using the EZ-IO.
Ong MEH; Chan YH; Oh JJ; Ngo AS
Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Jan; 27(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 19041528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the NIO and T.A.L.O.N Intraosseous Devices as Placed by U.S. Army Conventional Force Combat Medics-A Randomized Crossover Study.
Lange P; Umar M; Walker JD; Riddle M; Mochmer P
Mil Med; 2022 Jul; 187(7-8):e877-e881. PubMed ID: 34327538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraosseous infusion rates under high pressure: a cadaveric comparison of anatomic sites.
Pasley J; Miller CH; DuBose JJ; Shackelford SA; Fang R; Boswell K; Halcome C; Casey J; Cotter M; Matsuura M; Relph N; Tarmey NT; Stein DM
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2015 Feb; 78(2):295-9. PubMed ID: 25757113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial.
Reades R; Studnek JR; Vandeventer S; Garrett J
Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Dec; 58(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 21856044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Two Intraosseous Devices: The NIO Versus the EZ-IO by Novice Users-A Randomized Cross Over Trial.
Shina A; Baruch EN; Shlaifer A; Shovali A; Levi M; Yosefy O; Segal D; Bader T; Shavit I; Yitzhak A
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2017; 21(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 27870553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Paramedics successfully perform humeral EZ-IO intraosseous access in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
Wampler D; Schwartz D; Shumaker J; Bolleter S; Beckett R; Manifold C
Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Sep; 30(7):1095-9. PubMed ID: 22030185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The association of tibial vs. humeral intraosseous vascular access with patient outcomes in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.
Brebner C; Asamoah-Boaheng M; Zaidel B; Yap J; Scheuermeyer F; Mok V; Christian M; Kawano T; Singh L; van Diepen S; Christenson J; Grunau B
Resuscitation; 2023 Dec; 193():110031. PubMed ID: 37923113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of intravascular access methods applied by nurses wearing personal protective equipment in simulated COVID-19 resuscitation: A randomized crossover simulation trial.
Drozd A; Smereka J; Pruc M; Malysz M; Gasecka A; Sonmez LO; Cyran M; Konge L; Szarpak L
Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Nov; 49():189-194. PubMed ID: 34126564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of success rate and access time for an adult sternal intraosseous device deployed in the prehospital setting.
Byars DV; Tsuchitani SN; Erwin E; Anglemyer B; Eastman J
Prehosp Disaster Med; 2011 Apr; 26(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21888733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraosseous access EZ-IO in a prehospital emergency service.
Torres F; Galán MD; Alonso Mdel M; Suárez R; Camacho C; Almagro V
J Emerg Nurs; 2013 Sep; 39(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 23099011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distal femur versus humeral or tibial IO, access in adult out of hospital cardiac resuscitation.
Rayas EG; Winckler C; Bolleter S; Stringfellow M; Miramontes D; Shumaker J; Lewis A; Wampler D
Resuscitation; 2022 Jan; 170():11-16. PubMed ID: 34748766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of first-attempt success between tibial and humeral intraosseous insertions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Reades R; Studnek JR; Garrett JS; Vandeventer S; Blackwell T
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(2):278-81. PubMed ID: 21275573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Fluid Resuscitation Rate with and without External Pressure Using Two Intraosseous Infusion Systems for Adult Emergencies, the CITRIN (Comparison of InTRaosseous infusion systems in emergency medicINe)-Study.
Hammer N; Möbius R; Gries A; Hossfeld B; Bechmann I; Bernhard M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143726. PubMed ID: 26630579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of NIO and EZ-IO intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation performed by paramedics: a randomized crossover manikin trial.
Szarpak Ł; Czyzewski Ł; Woloszczuk-Gebicka B; Krajewski P; Fudalej M; Truszewski Z
Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Jun; 34(6):1166-7. PubMed ID: 27033737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in German Helicopter Emergency Medical Service.
Helm M; Haunstein B; Schlechtriemen T; Ruppert M; Lampl L; Gäßler M
Resuscitation; 2015 Mar; 88():43-7. PubMed ID: 25553609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility study of a novel intraosseous device in adult human cadavers.
Singh S; Aggarwal P; Lodha R; Agarwal R; Gupta AK; Dhingra R; Karve JS; Jaggu SK; Bhargava B
Indian J Med Res; 2016 Mar; 143(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 27241639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of the evolution of intraosseous access in tactical settings and a feasibility study of a human cadaver model for a humeral head approach.
Rush S; D'Amore J; Boccio E
Mil Med; 2014 Aug; 179(8 Suppl):24-8. PubMed ID: 25102545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
