These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27196802)

  • 1. A Systematic Review on Existing Measures for the Subjective Assessment of Rehabilitation and Assistive Robot Devices.
    Koumpouros Y
    J Healthc Eng; 2016; 2016():. PubMed ID: 27196802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a metric to evaluate the ergonomic principles of assistive systems, based on the DIN 92419.
    Xavier Macedo de Azevedo F; Heimgärtner R; Nebe K
    Ergonomics; 2023 Jun; 66(6):821-848. PubMed ID: 36137226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cognitive remediation and cognitive assistive technologies in schizophrenia].
    Sablier J; Stip E; Franck N
    Encephale; 2009 Apr; 35(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 19393385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review.
    Papadopoulos I; Koulouglioti C; Lazzarino R; Ali S
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e033096. PubMed ID: 31924639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of robo-assisted lower limb rehabilitation for spastic patients: A systematic review.
    Shakti D; Mathew L; Kumar N; Kataria C
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2018 Oct; 117():403-415. PubMed ID: 29960851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reimagining robotic walkers for real-world outdoor play environments with insights from legged robots: a scoping review.
    Stewart-Height A; Koditschek DE; Johnson MJ
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Aug; 18(6):798-818. PubMed ID: 34087079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standardization of Care and Assistive Products Involving Robot Technology.
    Yamada Y; Kurachi K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 242():535-541. PubMed ID: 28873850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Usability study of a smart transfer-assistive robot with dual arms for care workers.
    Kim YS; Shin HR; Yoon HJ; Ban SW; Kim YG; Jung KW; In H
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Jul; 19(5):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 38019053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Translation and validation of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment in Greek in order to assess satisfaction with use of the selected assistive device.
    Koumpouros Y; Papageorgiou E; Karavasili A; Alexopoulou D
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Jul; 12(5):535-542. PubMed ID: 27049479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tailor-made rehabilitation approach using multiple types of hybrid assistive limb robots for acute stroke patients: A pilot study.
    Fukuda H; Morishita T; Ogata T; Saita K; Hyakutake K; Watanabe J; Shiota E; Inoue T
    Assist Technol; 2016; 28(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 26478988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Promoting Interactions Between Humans and Robots Using Robotic Emotional Behavior.
    Ficocelli M; Terao J; Nejat G
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2016 Dec; 46(12):2911-2923. PubMed ID: 26552105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lower limb rehabilitation robotics: The current understanding and technology.
    Bhardwaj S; Khan AA; Muzammil M
    Work; 2021; 69(3):775-793. PubMed ID: 34180443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Child and parent perceptions of acceptability and therapeutic value of a socially assistive robot used during pediatric rehabilitation.
    Butchart J; Harrison R; Ritchie J; Martí F; McCarthy C; Knight S; Scheinberg A
    Disabil Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 43(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 31120794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead.
    Day H; Jutai J; Campbell KA
    Disabil Rehabil; 2002 Jan 10-Feb 15; 24(1-3):31-7. PubMed ID: 11827152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic Services Acceptance in Smart Environments With Older Adults: User Satisfaction and Acceptability Study.
    Cavallo F; Esposito R; Limosani R; Manzi A; Bevilacqua R; Felici E; Di Nuovo A; Cangelosi A; Lattanzio F; Dario P
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Sep; 20(9):e264. PubMed ID: 30249588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods to evaluate perspectives of safety, independence, activity, and participation in older persons using welfare technology. A systematic review.
    Zander V; Johansson-Pajala RM; Gustafsson C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 May; 15(4):373-393. PubMed ID: 30786779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice.
    Bernd T; Van Der Pijl D; De Witte LP
    Scand J Occup Ther; 2009 Sep; 16(3):146-58. PubMed ID: 18846479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shared autonomy in assistive mobile robots: a review.
    Udupa S; Kamat VR; Menassa CC
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Aug; 18(6):827-848. PubMed ID: 34133906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Automated Planning Model for HRI: Use Cases on Social Assistive Robotics.
    Fuentetaja R; García-Olaya A; García J; González JC; Fernández F
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Nov; 20(22):. PubMed ID: 33202674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wireless intraoral tongue control of an assistive robotic arm for individuals with tetraplegia.
    Andreasen Struijk LNS; Egsgaard LL; Lontis R; Gaihede M; Bentsen B
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Nov; 14(1):110. PubMed ID: 29110736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.