These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27196893)

  • 1. Recent Progress in Treating Protein-Ligand Interactions with Quantum-Mechanical Methods.
    Yilmazer ND; Korth M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2016 May; 17(5):. PubMed ID: 27196893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of molecular mechanics, semi-empirical quantum mechanical, and density functional theory methods for scoring protein-ligand interactions.
    Yilmazer ND; Korth M
    J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jul; 117(27):8075-84. PubMed ID: 23758433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospects of Applying Enhanced Semi-Empirical QM Methods for 2101 Virtual Drug Design.
    Yilmazer ND; Korth M
    Curr Med Chem; 2016; 23(20):2101-11. PubMed ID: 27183985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirically corrected DFT and semi-empirical methods for non-bonding interactions.
    Foster ME; Sohlberg K
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2010 Jan; 12(2):307-22. PubMed ID: 20023806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ligand-Binding Affinity Estimates Supported by Quantum-Mechanical Methods.
    Ryde U; Söderhjelm P
    Chem Rev; 2016 May; 116(9):5520-66. PubMed ID: 27077817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A semiempirical approach to ligand-binding affinities: dependence on the Hamiltonian and corrections.
    Mikulskis P; Genheden S; Wichmann K; Ryde U
    J Comput Chem; 2012 May; 33(12):1179-89. PubMed ID: 22396176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Theoretical Study of Protein-Ligand Interactions Using the Molecules-in-Molecules Fragmentation-Based Method.
    Thapa B; Beckett D; Erickson J; Raghavachari K
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Oct; 14(10):5143-5155. PubMed ID: 30265003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational study of ligand binding to protein receptors.
    Wembridge P; Robinson H; Novak I
    Bioorg Chem; 2008 Dec; 36(6):288-94. PubMed ID: 18801553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protein-ligand interaction energies with dispersion corrected density functional theory and high-level wave function based methods.
    Antony J; Grimme S; Liakos DG; Neese F
    J Phys Chem A; 2011 Oct; 115(41):11210-20. PubMed ID: 21842894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A QM protein-ligand investigation of antipsychotic drugs with the dopamine D2 Receptor (D2R).
    Ekhteiari Salmas R; Serhat Is Y; Durdagi S; Stein M; Yurtsever M
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2018 Aug; 36(10):2668-2677. PubMed ID: 28805144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced semiempirical QM methods for biomolecular interactions.
    Yilmazer ND; Korth M
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2015; 13():169-75. PubMed ID: 25848495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calculations on noncovalent interactions and databases of benchmark interaction energies.
    Hobza P
    Acc Chem Res; 2012 Apr; 45(4):663-72. PubMed ID: 22225511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How accurate is the description of ligand-protein interactions by a hybrid QM/MM approach?
    Kollar J; Frecer V
    J Mol Model; 2017 Dec; 24(1):11. PubMed ID: 29234892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empirical hydrogen-bond potential functions--an old hat reconditioned.
    Korth M
    Chemphyschem; 2011 Dec; 12(17):3131-42. PubMed ID: 22038888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimates of ligand-binding affinities supported by quantum mechanical methods.
    Söderhjelm P; Kongsted J; Genheden S; Ryde U
    Interdiscip Sci; 2010 Mar; 2(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 20640794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supramolecular binding thermodynamics by dispersion-corrected density functional theory.
    Grimme S
    Chemistry; 2012 Aug; 18(32):9955-64. PubMed ID: 22782805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physics-based scoring of protein-ligand interactions: explicit polarizability, quantum mechanics and free energies.
    Bryce RA
    Future Med Chem; 2011 Apr; 3(6):683-98. PubMed ID: 21554075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some practical approaches to treating electrostatic polarization of proteins.
    Ji C; Mei Y
    Acc Chem Res; 2014 Sep; 47(9):2795-803. PubMed ID: 24883956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of trypsin specificity based on QM/MM molecular dynamics simulation and QM/MM GBSA calculation.
    Chen J; Wang J; Zhang Q; Chen K; Zhu W
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2015; 33(12):2606-18. PubMed ID: 25562613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A reliable docking/scoring scheme based on the semiempirical quantum mechanical PM6-DH2 method accurately covering dispersion and H-bonding: HIV-1 protease with 22 ligands.
    Fanfrlík J; Bronowska AK; Rezác J; Prenosil O; Konvalinka J; Hobza P
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Oct; 114(39):12666-78. PubMed ID: 20839830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.