These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27196996)

  • 1. Cosmetic Cleansing Oil Absorption by Soft Contact Lenses in Dry and Wet Conditions.
    Tsukiyama J; Miyamoto Y; Kodama A; Fukuda M; Shimomura Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2017 Sep; 43(5):318-323. PubMed ID: 27196996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impact of Cosmetics on the Physical Dimension and Optical Performance of Contemporary Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses.
    Luensmann D; van Doorn K; May C; Srinivasan S; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2020 May; 46(3):166-173. PubMed ID: 31232789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving contact-lens related dryness symptoms with silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Chalmers R; Long B; Dillehay S; Begley C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 85(8):778-84. PubMed ID: 18677242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adhesion of Acanthamoeba on Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses.
    Lee GH; Lee JE; Park MK; Yu HS
    Cornea; 2016 May; 35(5):663-8. PubMed ID: 26938330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of multipurpose contact lens care solutions on the adhesion of Acanthamoeba to silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Uno T; Ohashi Y; Nomachi M; Imayasu M
    Cornea; 2012 Oct; 31(10):1170-5. PubMed ID: 22673849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of Cosmetics on the Surface Properties of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses.
    Srinivasan S; Otchere H; Yu M; Yang J; Luensmann D; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jul; 41(4):228-35. PubMed ID: 25719434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro evaluation of lipids adsorbed on silicone hydrogel contact lenses using a new gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analytical method.
    Iwata M; Ohno S; Kawai T; Ichijima H; Cavanagh HD
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Sep; 34(5):272-80. PubMed ID: 18779667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of Cosmetics on the Physical Dimension and Optical Performance of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses.
    Luensmann D; Yu M; Yang J; Srinivasan S; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jul; 41(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 25723565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method of imaging lipids on silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Pucker AD; Nichols JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 May; 89(5):E777-87. PubMed ID: 22525130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of two silicone-hydrogel contact lenses for bandage use after photorefractive keratectomy.
    Plaka A; Grentzelos MA; Astyrakakis NI; Kymionis GD; Pallikaris IG; Plainis S
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Oct; 36(5):243-6. PubMed ID: 23522992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft contact lens cleaning: rub or no-rub?
    Cho P; Cheng SY; Chan WY; Yip WK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jan; 29(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 19154280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bacterial adhesion to worn silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Santos L; Rodrigues D; Lira M; Real Oliveira ME; Oliveira R; Vilar EY; Azeredo J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):520-5. PubMed ID: 18594343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditioning of hydrogel lenses by a multipurpose solution containing an ocular lubricant.
    Simmons PA; Donshik PC; Kelly WF; Vehige JG
    CLAO J; 2001 Oct; 27(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 11725980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of in-air and in-saline focimeter measurement of the back vertex power of spherical soft contact lenses.
    Pearson RM; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):508-17. PubMed ID: 22958210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Equilibrium binding interactions between lotrafilcon a soft contact lenses and the two prostaglandin antiglaucoma drugs bimatoprost and tafluprost.
    Kenley RA; Filippone H; Giske M; Beidler D; Vehige J; Fleitman J
    Eye Contact Lens; 2013 Jul; 39(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 23771012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Polymer-interaction driven diffusionof eyeshadow in soft contact lenses.
    Tavazzi S; Rossi A; Picarazzi S; Ascagni M; Farris S; Borghesi A
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):335-339. PubMed ID: 28693972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Care regimen and lens material influence on silicone hydrogel contact lens deposition.
    Zhao Z; Carnt NA; Aliwarga Y; Wei X; Naduvilath T; Garrett Q; Korth J; Willcox MD
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 19165125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contact lenses as a drug delivery device for epidermal growth factor in the treatment of ocular wounds.
    Schultz CL; Morck DW
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 20406255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compatibility of two new silicone hydrogel contact lenses with three soft contact lens multipurpose solutions*.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J; Barrado-Navascués E; Rubido-Crespo MJ; Sugimoto K; Sawano T
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):373-81. PubMed ID: 18565093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Lens Care Systems on Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Hydrophobicity.
    Lira M; Silva R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2017 Mar; 43(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 26859741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.