305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27197277)
1. Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Honein-AbouHaidar GN; Kastner M; Vuong V; Perrier L; Daly C; Rabeneck L; Straus S; Baxter NN
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Jun; 25(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 27197277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Facilitators and Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening during Long COVID: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Study Synthesis of Qualitative Research.
Gebremeskel TG; Romeo F; Shama AT; Bonevski B; Trigg J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2024 Apr; 21(5):. PubMed ID: 38791759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.
Dressler J; Johnsen AT; Madsen LJ; Rasmussen M; Jorgensen LN
Public Health; 2021 Jan; 190():67-74. PubMed ID: 33360029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer.
Hall N; Birt L; Rees CJ; Walter FM; Elliot S; Ritchie M; Weller D; Rubin G
BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012304. PubMed ID: 27836872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Fault-line of an earthquake": a qualitative examination of barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer screening in rural, Eastern North Carolina.
Jilcott Pitts SB; Lea CS; May CL; Stowe C; Hamill DJ; Walker KT; Fitzgerald TL
J Rural Health; 2013; 29(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 23289658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health literacy and informed decision making regarding colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.
van der Heide I; Uiters E; Jantine Schuit A; Rademakers J; Fransen M
Eur J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 25(4):575-82. PubMed ID: 25733553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening: a protocol for a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.
Honein-Abouhaidar GN; Kastner M; Vuong V; Perrier L; Rabeneck L; Tinmouth J; Straus S; Baxter NN
BMJ Open; 2014 Feb; 4(2):e004508. PubMed ID: 24578543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Barriers to and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in different population subgroups in Adelaide, South Australia.
Javanparast S; Ward PR; Carter SM; Wilson CJ
Med J Aust; 2012 May; 196(8):521-3. PubMed ID: 22571311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attitudes and perceptions of people with a learning disability, family carers, and paid care workers towards cancer screening programmes in the United Kingdom: A qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation.
Byrnes K; Hamilton S; McGeechan GJ; O'Malley C; Mankelow J; Giles EL
Psychooncology; 2020 Mar; 29(3):475-484. PubMed ID: 31834649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding Patients' Experiences of Diagnosis and Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer in a Safety-Net Hospital System: A Qualitative Study.
Leal IM; Kao LS; Karanjawala B; Escamilla RJ; Ko TC; Millas SG
Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Apr; 61(4):504-513. PubMed ID: 29521833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review.
Wools A; Dapper EA; de Leeuw JR
Eur J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 26(1):158-68. PubMed ID: 26370437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Puerto Rico.
Colón-López V; Valencia-Torres IM; Ríos EI; Llavona J; Vélez-Álamo C; Fernández ME
J Cancer Educ; 2023 Apr; 38(2):552-561. PubMed ID: 35359256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding colorectal cancer screening among ethnic minority groups in the Netherlands - a qualitative study.
Woudstra AJ; Dekker E; Essink-Bot ML; Suurmond J
Health Expect; 2016 Dec; 19(6):1312-1323. PubMed ID: 26576015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding barriers and facilitators to participation in colorectal cancer screening: A French qualitative study.
Le Bonniec A; Mas S; Préau M; Cousson-Gélie F
J Health Psychol; 2021 Oct; 26(12):2260-2277. PubMed ID: 32166981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring implications of Medicaid participation and wait times for colorectal screening on early detection efforts in Connecticut--a secret-shopper survey.
Patel VB; Nahar R; Murray B; Salner AL
Conn Med; 2013 Apr; 77(4):197-203. PubMed ID: 23691732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring the decision to participate in the National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
Ekberg M; Callender M; Hamer H; Rogers S
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2014 Sep; 23(5):391-7. PubMed ID: 24418799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.
Adhikari K; Manalili K; Law J; Bischoff M; Teare GF
J Am Board Fam Med; 2022; 35(4):840-858. PubMed ID: 35896448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors Associated with Informed Decisions and Participation in Bowel Cancer Screening among Adults with Lower Education and Literacy.
Smith SK; Simpson JM; Trevena LJ; McCaffery KJ
Med Decis Making; 2014 Aug; 34(6):756-72. PubMed ID: 24421292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of gender on decisions to participate in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study.
Clarke N; Gallagher P; Kearney PM; McNamara D; Sharp L
Psychooncology; 2016 Dec; 25(12):1456-1462. PubMed ID: 26864167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
