145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27198095)
1. Ensuring the Quality of Evidence: Using the Best Design to Answer Health IT Questions.
Weir CR
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():90-101. PubMed ID: 27198095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics.
Harris AD; McGregor JC; Perencevich EN; Furuno JP; Zhu J; Peterson DE; Finkelstein J
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2006; 13(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 16221933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finding, Appraising and Interpreting the Evidence of Health IT.
Georgiou A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():312-23. PubMed ID: 27198113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 6: risk of bias assessment.
Waddington H; Aloe AM; Becker BJ; Djimeu EW; Hombrados JG; Tugwell P; Wells G; Reeves B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():43-52. PubMed ID: 28351693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Threats to the Internal Validity of Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Healthcare.
Flannelly KJ; Flannelly LT; Jankowski KRB
J Health Care Chaplain; 2018; 24(3):107-130. PubMed ID: 29364793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Strong quasi-experimental designs for research on the effectiveness of rehabilitation.
Johnston MV; Ottenbacher KJ; Reichardt CS
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1995; 74(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 7576417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Quasi experimental evaluation of public health interventions (author's transl)].
Patrick DL
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1981; 29(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 7302309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Theoretical Basis of Health IT Evaluation.
Brender McNair J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():39-52. PubMed ID: 27198091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of Health IT Evaluations.
Nykänen P; Kaipio J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():291-303. PubMed ID: 27198111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
Allen D; Rixson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Overcoming design problems in evaluating health behavior programs.
Flay BR; Best JA
Eval Health Prof; 1982 Mar; 5(1):43-69. PubMed ID: 10254764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The quality of evidence in health informatics: how did the quality of healthcare IT evaluation publications develop from 1982 to 2005?
de Keizer NF; Ammenwerth E
Int J Med Inform; 2008 Jan; 77(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 17208040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does health informatics have a replication crisis?
Coiera E; Ammenwerth E; Georgiou A; Magrabi F
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Aug; 25(8):963-968. PubMed ID: 29669066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation design and technical assistance opportunities: early findings from the Beacon Community Program evaluation teams.
Rein A; Kennedy H; DeCoudres B; Singer Cohen R; Sabharwal R; Fairbrother G
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2012 Jan; 1():1-22. PubMed ID: 22351970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence-based Health Informatics Frameworks for Applied Use.
Craven CK; Doebbeling B; Furniss D; Holden RJ; Lau F; Novak LL
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():77-89. PubMed ID: 27198094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applying GEP-HI for the planning of an evaluation study: a case study walkthrough (workshop).
Nykänen P; Brender J; Ammenwerth E; Talmon J; Rigby M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 174():134-6. PubMed ID: 22491127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quasi experimental designs in pharmacist intervention research.
Krass I
Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Jun; 38(3):647-54. PubMed ID: 26825756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A reconsideration of operations research experimental designs.
Reynolds J
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1991; 371():377-94. PubMed ID: 1956897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental designs.
Behi R; Nolan M
Br J Nurs; 1996 Jun 27-Jul 10; 5(12):754-6. PubMed ID: 8718332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
