These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27198095)

  • 41. Types of research designs.
    Davis DW
    Neonatal Netw; 2003; 22(5):65-7. PubMed ID: 14598981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Introducing guidelines for good evaluation practice in health informatics.
    Nykänen P; Brender J; Ammenwerth E; Talmon J; de Keizer N; Rigby M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():958-62. PubMed ID: 19745455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Using mixed methods research designs in health psychology: an illustrated discussion from a pragmatist perspective.
    Bishop FL
    Br J Health Psychol; 2015 Feb; 20(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 25405549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A review of measurement practice in studies of clinical decision support systems 1998-2017.
    Scott PJ; Brown AW; Adedeji T; Wyatt JC; Georgiou A; Eisenstein EL; Friedman CP
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Oct; 26(10):1120-1128. PubMed ID: 30990522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessing the quality of medical information technology economic evaluations: room for improvement.
    Eisenstein EL; Ortiz M; Anstrom KJ; Crosslin DR; Lobach DF
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():234-8. PubMed ID: 17238338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Inventory of research methods for librarianship and informatics.
    Eldredge JD
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Jan; 92(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 14762467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A Primer on Single-Case Research Designs: Contemporary Use and Analysis.
    Ledford JR; Barton EE; Severini KE; Zimmerman KN
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2019 Jan; 124(1):35-56. PubMed ID: 30715924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Understanding the information needs of public health practitioners: a literature review to inform design of an interactive digital knowledge management system.
    Revere D; Turner AM; Madhavan A; Rambo N; Bugni PF; Kimball A; Fuller SS
    J Biomed Inform; 2007 Aug; 40(4):410-21. PubMed ID: 17324632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mixed Methods: A Paradigm for Holistic Evaluation of Health IT.
    Scott PJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():102-13. PubMed ID: 27198096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Methodological convergence of program evaluation designs.
    Chacón-Moscoso S; Anguera MT; Sanduvete-Chaves S; Sánchez-Martín M
    Psicothema; 2014; 26(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 24444735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Developing and using evidence to improve rehabilitation practice.
    Seel RT; Dijkers MP; Johnston MV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8 Suppl):S97-100. PubMed ID: 22683205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Research management in healthcare informatics - experiences from Norway.
    Faxvaag A; Toussaint P; Johansen TS
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():980-4. PubMed ID: 21893892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. eHealth evaluation and dissemination research.
    Glasgow RE
    Am J Prev Med; 2007 May; 32(5 Suppl):S119-26. PubMed ID: 17466816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of Health IT in Low-Income Countries.
    Oluoch T; de Keizer NF
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():324-35. PubMed ID: 27198114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Impact of patient selection in various study designs: identifying potential bias in clinical results.
    Berbano EP; Baxi N
    South Med J; 2012 Mar; 105(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 22392211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Study designs for effectiveness and translation research :identifying trade-offs.
    Mercer SL; DeVinney BJ; Fine LJ; Green LW; Dougherty D
    Am J Prev Med; 2007 Aug; 33(2):139-154. PubMed ID: 17673103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Evidence and medical decision-making--what kind of evidence do we really need?].
    Weber Ch; Neeser K
    Versicherungsmedizin; 2007 Dec; 59(4):166-9. PubMed ID: 18210987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report.
    Rothman M; Burke L; Erickson P; Leidy NK; Patrick DL; Petrie CD
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1075-83. PubMed ID: 19804437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.