These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27198095)

  • 61. Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report.
    Rothman M; Burke L; Erickson P; Leidy NK; Patrick DL; Petrie CD
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1075-83. PubMed ID: 19804437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Overview of Study Designs: A Deep Dive Into Research Quality Assessment.
    McKeever L
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2021 Jun; 36(3):569-585. PubMed ID: 33788303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Qualitative methods used in medical informatics research: a 12-year review.
    Li J; Finkelstein J
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; ():1024. PubMed ID: 18998873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Quasi-Experimental Designs for Causal Inference.
    Kim Y; Steiner P
    Educ Psychol; 2016; 51(3-4):395-405. PubMed ID: 30100637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Researching Collective Mindfulness and Health IT: A Framework and Translation to Context-Specific Questions.
    Lichtner V; Franklin BD; Westbrook JI
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 265():31-36. PubMed ID: 31431573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 4: uses and value.
    Bärnighausen T; Tugwell P; Røttingen JA; Shemilt I; Rockers P; Geldsetzer P; Lavis J; Grimshaw J; Daniels K; Brown A; Bor J; Tanner J; Rashidian A; Barreto M; Vollmer S; Atun R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():21-29. PubMed ID: 28365303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Understanding how information and ICTs can improve health.
    Bath PA; Sen BA; Raptis DA; Mettler T
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2012 Feb; 12(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 22280190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A Simulation Study of Threats to Validity in Quasi-Experimental Designs: Interrelationship between Design, Measurement, and Analysis.
    Holgado-Tello FP; Chacón-Moscoso S; Sanduvete-Chaves S; Pérez-Gil JA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():897. PubMed ID: 27378991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Methodological observations on applied behavioral science.
    Gingerich WJ
    J Appl Behav Sci; 1984 Feb; 20(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 10265852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Single-case experimental designs. Evaluating interventions in research and clinical practice.
    Kazdin AE
    Behav Res Ther; 2019 Jun; 117():3-17. PubMed ID: 30527785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A review of the non-equivalent control group post-test-only design.
    Krishnan P
    Nurse Res; 2019 Sep; 26(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 30226337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part II: Design selection and arrangement of experimental phases.
    Kearns KP
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 Aug; 51(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 3525987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Threats to Internal Validity in Multiple-Baseline Design Variations.
    Slocum TA; Pinkelman SE; Joslyn PR; Nichols B
    Perspect Behav Sci; 2022 Sep; 45(3):619-638. PubMed ID: 36249165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. V. DESIGN-BASED APPROACHES FOR IMPROVING MEASUREMENT IN DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE.
    Rush J; Hofer SM
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2017 Jun; 82(2):67-83. PubMed ID: 28475257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Experimental design and husbandry.
    Festing MF
    Exp Gerontol; 1997; 32(1-2):39-47. PubMed ID: 9088900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. 'Horses for Courses': the differences between quantitative and qualitative approaches to research.
    Redmond AC; Keenan AM; Landorf K
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2002 Mar; 92(3):159-69. PubMed ID: 11904331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Revisiting an Analysis of Threats to Internal Validity in Multiple Baseline Designs.
    Slocum TA; Joslyn PR; Nichols B; Pinkelman SE
    Perspect Behav Sci; 2022 Sep; 45(3):681-694. PubMed ID: 36249172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The validity of qualitative research.
    Lippman A
    Can J Public Health; 1997; 88(2):141. PubMed ID: 9170699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. How to Ask the Right Question and Find the Right Answer: Clinical Research for Transplant Nephrologists.
    Rodríguez-Ramírez S; Kim SJ
    Front Immunol; 2022; 13():879200. PubMed ID: 35619692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Overview of research designs.
    Clancy MJ
    Emerg Med J; 2002 Nov; 19(6):546-9. PubMed ID: 12421782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.