These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27198777)

  • 1. Accuracy and precision of alternative estimators of ectoparasiticide efficacy.
    Schall R; Burger DA; Luus HG
    Vet Parasitol; 2016 Jun; 223():50-6. PubMed ID: 27198777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of uncertainty in total parasite infestation on accuracy and precision of estimates of ectoparasiticide efficacy.
    Schall R; Burger DA; Erasmus TP
    Vet Parasitol; 2016 Oct; 230():6-8. PubMed ID: 27884443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness.
    Milligan BG
    Genetics; 2003 Mar; 163(3):1153-67. PubMed ID: 12663552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geometric means provide a biased efficacy result when conducting a faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT).
    Dobson RJ; Sangster NC; Besier RB; Woodgate RG
    Vet Parasitol; 2009 Apr; 161(1-2):162-7. PubMed ID: 19135802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of the log-normal mean.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 1998 Oct; 17(19):2251-64. PubMed ID: 9802182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis and the reversed Theorem of the Means.
    Edwardes MD
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 26052955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimators of the local false discovery rate designed for small numbers of tests.
    Padilla M; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Oct; 11(5):4. PubMed ID: 23079518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the negative binomial dispersion parameter.
    Saha K; Paul S
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 15737091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient estimation of Pareto model: Some modified percentile estimators.
    Bhatti SH; Hussain S; Ahmad T; Aslam M; Aftab M; Raza MA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196456. PubMed ID: 29715280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exact expressions for the bias and variance of estimators of the mean of a lognormal distribution.
    Attfield MD; Hewett P
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Jul; 53(7):432-5. PubMed ID: 1496934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the inadmissibility of Watterson's estimator.
    Futschik A; Gach F
    Theor Popul Biol; 2008 Mar; 73(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 18215409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shrinkage estimation of effect sizes as an alternative to hypothesis testing followed by estimation in high-dimensional biology: applications to differential gene expression.
    Montazeri Z; Yanofsky CM; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article23. PubMed ID: 20597849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A restricted maximum likelihood estimator for truncated height samples.
    A'Hearn B
    Econ Hum Biol; 2004 Mar; 2(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 15463990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of non-iterative and iterative estimators of heterogeneity variance for the standardized mortality ratio.
    Böhning D; Sarol J; Rattanasiri S; Viwatwongkasem C; Biggeri A
    Biostatistics; 2004 Jan; 5(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 14744828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Harmonization of regulatory guidelines on efficacy of ectoparasiticides for companion animals: status and missing points.
    Curet Bobey M
    Vet Parasitol; 2015 Feb; 208(1-2):48-55. PubMed ID: 25624073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the intraclass correlation parameter for binary data.
    Saha KK; Paul SR
    Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3497-512. PubMed ID: 16007569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ratio estimation with measurement error in the auxiliary variate.
    Gregoire TG; Salas C
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):590-8. PubMed ID: 18759838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing performance of nonparametric species richness estimators under constrained sampling.
    Rajakaruna H; Drake DAR; T Chan F; Bailey SA
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Oct; 6(20):7311-7322. PubMed ID: 28725399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical analysis of binary data generated from multilocus dominant DNA markers.
    Khang TF; Yap VB
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2010 Nov; 10(6):995-1008. PubMed ID: 21565109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.